This program in it's HTML version may allowing individual adjustments of taxa (adding, removal, transferring, correcting) _ Return back to TITLE PAGE!
| |||
Contents of this page and facility for searching
Type genus Euophrys.
Euophryinae PART 2
Echeclus-Pystira. Echeclus Ecuadattus ,Efate, Emathis, Ergane, Euophrys Euryattus, Featheroides, Foliabitus, Frewena, Gen[Jau
34] Hasarina, Hypoblemum Ilargus Jotus Junxattus, Lagnus, Lakarobius, Laufeia, Lechia Lepidemathis, Leptathamas, Lophostica, Lycidas, Mabellina Maeota Maeotella Magyarus, Maileus, Maratus, Marengo Margaromma, Mexigonus Microhasarius Mopiopia, Muziris, Naphrys, Nebridia, Neon Neonella Nicylla, Ocnotelus "Oningis" Omoedus, Opisthoncana Orcevia, Parabathippus, Paraharmochirus, Parvattus Pensacola Pensacolops Petemathis Phasmolia Popcornella, Pristobaeus (syn. Palpelius), Prostheclina, Pseudemathis Pseudeuophrys, ,Pseudosynagelides Pystira . |
Gen. Echeclus Thorell, 1890
Type species Echeclus concinnus Thorell, 1890 (2 recognizable species) Compare with other genera in vol. I at Echeclus
|
Gen. Ecuadattus Zhang & Maddison, 2012
Type species Ecuadattus typicus (4 recognizable species) Compare with other genera in vol. I at Ecuadattus |
Gen. Efate Berland, 1938
Type species Efate albobicinctus (3 recognizable species) Compare with other genera in vol. I at Efate figs 40-46. All © copyrights are retained by the original authors and copyrights holders, used by here by their courtesy. . |
Gen. Emathis Simon, 1899
Type species Emathis weyersi (7 species + 1 misplaced) Compare with other genera in vol. I at Emathis
+ Atlas ...: 74. All © copyrights are retained by the original authors and copyrights holders, used by here by their courtesy. .
|
Gen. Euochin Prószyński, 2018
[ in: Prószyński, J., Lissner, J. & Schäfer, M. (2018)] Type species Euophrys atrata Song & Chai, 1992 (27 species ) Compare with other genera in vol. I at Euochin |
Gen. Euochin Prószyński, 2018 [ in: Prószyński, J., Lissner, J. & Schäfer, M. (2018)] Type species Euophrys atrata Song & Chai, 1992 (27 species ) Compare with other genera in vol. I at Euochin
|
Gen. Euophrys Koch C.L., 1834
Type species Euophrys frontalis (98 species in WSC ) Compare with other genera in vol. I at Euophrys See also Unpublished Euophrys manuscript
+ J. Lissner.. All © copyrights are retained by the original authors and copyrights holders, used by here by their courtesy. .
figs 2166-2168 + ©Zhang J., Maddison 2015: Zootaxa 3938 (1): 29, f 860-861. © Magnolia Press. All © copyrights are retained by the original authors and copyrights holders, used by here by their courtesy. .
Euophrys
uphami +b) talassica :Proszynski
J. 1987a. Atlas ...: 101 + Wesołowska 2012a: 20(2): 326-327, 6–8
+ Peckhams 1903. 14 (1): 214, t. 23, f 1-1a-c +c) Logunov D.V. 1997b. Bull.
British Arachn. Soc., 10 (9): 348-349,
figs. 17, 23-26 . All © copyrights are retained by the original authors and copyrights holders, used by here by their courtesy. .
|
Gen. Euryattus Thorell, 1881
Type species Euryattus porcellus (12 recognizable species [15 in WSC]). Compare with other genera in vol. I at Euryattus
|
Gen. Featheroides Peng, Ying, Kim 1994
Type species Featheroides typica (2 species) Compare with other genera in vol. I at Featheroides |
Gen. Foliabitus Zhang J., Maddison, 2012
Type species Foliabitus longzhou (2 recognizable species). Compare with other genera in vol. I at Foliabitus |
Gen. Frewena Richardson, 2013
Type species Frewena maculata (2 recognizable species). Compare with other genera in vol. I at Frewena |
Gen. Hasarina Schenkel,
1963
Type species Hasarina contortospinosa. (.... species) Compare with other genera in vol. I at Hasarina |
Gen. Hypoblemum Peckham, Peckham, 1886
Type species Maratus amabilis Karsch, 1878 (nomenclatorical mess - pending serious revision of the whole group of genera[?]) Compare with other genera in vol. I at Hypoblemum Comment: Beautiful example of scientific problems in the WSC: "type Maratus amabilis Karsch, 1878; gender masculine N.B.: revalidated by Zabka, 1987b: 479; considered a senior synonym of Lycidas Karsch, 1878d: 25 (type L. anomalus Karsch, 1878) by Otto & Hill, 2012a: 23 (revalidated by Prószynski, 1984a: 159 and considered not a senior synonym of Jotus L. Koch, 1881 by Davies & Zabka, 1989: 238, contra Zabka, 1987b: 451); considered a senior synonym of Hypoblemum Peckham & Peckham, 1886: 326 (type Acmaea villosa Keyserling, 1883 = Maratus griseus (Keyserling, 1882)) and of Saratus Otto & Hill, 2017a: 70 (type S. hesperus Otto & Hill, 2017) by Otto & Hill, 2021: 1; Hypoblemum is a replacement name for Drepanephora Keyserling, 1883b: 1477 (preoccupied in fossil Gastropoda by Eschscholtz, 1830), which itself is a replacement name for Acmaea Keyserling, 1883b: 1421 [by Keyserling, 1882: 1420 as nomen nudum] (preoccupied in Diptera by Loew, 1869); an unidentified female was illustrated by Davies & Zabka, 1989: 238, pl. 40."
REMARK. Genera Jotus, Hypoblemum, Lycidas, Maratus require taxonomic revision of ALL species - with the same methods, preferably by the same taxonomist..
|
Gen. Iberattus Prószyński, 2018
Type species Attus semi-glabratus Simon, 1868. Compare with other genera in vol. I at Iberattus New source: Prószyński, J., Noordam, A., Oger, P. & Schäfer, M. 2018: 85, f. A-T.8)
.[COMMENT. Identifed by structure of two chambered spermatheca, unusual in European Salticidae (compare spermatheca in I. semiglabratus, immediately above. see also "Saitis" imitatus (Simon, 1868, below)]. [COMMENT 2. Carrying 3 months exchange research in the Institute of Zoologyy AN USSR, in then Leningrad. 1971/1972, I have conscientiously prepared publication with 324 diagnostic drawings (apeared in 1979) , to help future Russian researchers to learn taxonomy of Salticidae - there was none since death of Kharitonow, the first willing students appeared only in 1987.] |
(see Prószynski, J., Noordam, A., Oger, P. & Schäfer, M. (2018:88, f. 2. Plate 57X. A-N )
Compare with other genera in vol. I at "Saitis" imitatus
REMARK:
S European species known from Croatia and Montenegro, resembling Iberattus semiglabratus by spermatheca divided into three chambers (poorly visible on photograph below), by appearance of palp and somewhat by type of general appearance. Pending further research.
COMMENT. "Saitis" imitatus- resembles Iberattus by structure of spermathecae, consisting of three chambers and lack of typical characters of Saitis. Pending further research - see Prószyński, J., Noordam, A., Oger, P. & Schäfer, M. (2018:88, f. 2 A-N ). |
Gen. Ilargus Simon, 1901
Type species Ilargus coccineus (10 species [14 species in WSC]). Compare with other genera in vol. I at largus
|
Gen. JotusKoch L., 1881
REMARK. Possibly alternative choice!
Genera Jotus, Hypoblemum, Lycidas, Maratus, Saitis and probably some related, require taxonomic revision of
ALL species. Their definitions are unclear and incomplete, due to fragmentary
knowledge of their morphology and biology. The practice of wholesale transfer
of large number of species, following their incidentally designated type
species, creates chaos. These genera are closely related, which is demonstrated
by structure of their palps and spermathecae. Newly described Jotus remus differs strikingly by "paddle" shaped bunch of setae on tarsus and metatarsus III and by abdominal pattern.
Type species Jotus auripes ? . (? species) Compare with other genera in vol. I at Jotus |
Gen. Junxattus Prószyński, Deeleman-Reinhold, 2012
Type species Junxattus daiqini (1 species). Compare with other genera in vol. I at Junxattus |
div>
Gen. Lagnus Koch L., 1879
Type species Lagnus longimanus (3 species). Compare with other genera in vol. I at Lagnus |
Gen. Lakarobius Berry, Beatty & Prószyński, 1998
Type species Lakarobius alboniger (1 recognizable species). Compare with other genera in vol. I at Lakarobius REMARK. Color pattern (but not genitalic structures) - comparable with Phasmolia |
Compare with other genera in vol. I at Laufeia
Dispute whether genera Junxattus, Laufeia and Orcevia should be synonymized in view of differences in palps and spermathecae Diagram by Prószyński
|
Gen. Lechia_new Zabka, 1985
Type species Lechia squamata (2 species). Compare with other genera in vol. II at Lechia new According to newest research of Dr Cheng Wang (corresponence, unpublished) ha has studied matched couple of Lechia squamata of which male fitting CHRYSILLINES - if confirmed that would force subfamilial transfer of the genus. Documentary photographs reproduced in file "1_CHRYSILLINES_2023". New interpretation, on new specimens, Pending comparison with type specimen. Source: Photo received from Dr Cheng Wang, unpublished. ©copyrights are retained by the original authors and copyright holders, used by his courtesy.
COMMENT: Epigyne of this species is compatible with previously documented struture of this species, but male palps and habitus are surprising.
Something very wrong: female identified by Logunov, Jaeger 2015 is apparently Lechia, but there are no reason to transfer it to Laufeia, (epigyne is different, its internal structure was not studied by any researcher to preserve type speciemen, the only female specimen known!), there are no premises to match it with male, which differs from Laufeia aenea by significant details of palp. J. Prószyński. Dr. D.V. Logunov as always knows better and offered following comments about genus Lechia (personal letter,2015-12-20): "Lechia minuta is not a published combination and it is presented in your database without any justification or explanation to be referrred to as your personal opinion. I reckon this is one of the reasons why the WSC does not refer to it. For the time being, this taxon is better to retain as Euophrys minuta (the original combination), until the male is found and decribed." |
Gen. Lepidemathis (Simon, 1899)
Type species Lepidemathis sericea (7 recognizable species). Compare with other genera in vol. I at Lepidemathis
A case of a perfect usage of a momentary occassion - participating in field research in Borneo, Dr. P. Koomen made series of photograph - showing unchanged coloration of a live/fresh specimen, later adding pictures of necessary diagnostic characters - permitting precise identification of species. Among thousands of incidental photograps by amateurs - series of photos by P. Koomen is the only case of wise taking opportunity.
|
Plate 503. . E-F - Lepidemathis luisae, G-I - Lepidemathis sp. undescribed from Philipines: Samar (photographs received from ©M. Freudenschuss with unpublished name, subsequent publication by Freudenschuss & Seiter, M. (2016) does not mention this species). Source: : A-B - Prószyński J. 1987. Atlas ...: 21, C-D -- ©Photo P. Koomen, E-I - Freudenschuss, M. & Seiter, M. (2016). Four new species of the jumping spiders from the Philippines, with description of the male of Phintella piatensis Barrion et Litsinger, 1995 (Araneae: Salticidae). Arthropoda Selecta 25(1): 85-97 .91-92, f. 15–21 . All ©copyrights are retained by the original authors and copyright holders, used by their courtesy. |
|
Gen. Leuserattus Prószyński & Deeleman-Reinhold,
2012
Type species Leuserattus gunung (2 species). Compare with other genera in vol. I at Leuserattus SOURCE Prószynski, Deeleman-Reinhold , 2012. Arthr. select. 21(1): 42-43, f 78-86. All ©copyrights are retained by the original authors and copyright holders, used by their courtesy. |
SOURCE: Deeleman-Reinhold, C. L. & Miller, J. A. (2021). Description of a new species of Leuserattus..., 2012, with comments on the type species L. gunung Prószyński et Deeleman-Reinhold, 2012 and associated genera (Araneae: Salticidae). Arthropoda Selecta 30(1): 105-112.. All ©copyrights are retained by the original authors and copyright holders, used by their courtesy. SOURCE: Deeleman-Reinhold, C. L. & Miller, J. A. (2021). Description of a new species of Leuserattus..., 2012, with comments on the type species L. gunung Prószyński et Deeleman-Reinhold, 2012 and associated genera (Araneae: Salticidae). Arthropoda Selecta 30(1): 105-112.. All ©copyrights are retained by the original authors and copyright holders, used by their courtesy. |
Gen. Ligdus Thorell, 1895
Type species Ligdus chelifer. (1 species). Compare with other genera in vol. I at Ligdus Ligdus garvale Caleb, in Caleb et al., 2024
Plate XXX.Ligdus garvale Caleb, in Caleb et al., 2024. SOURCE. Caleb, J. T. D., Shree, A. D., Kumar, L. & Abhijith, A. P. C. (2024). Reviving Ligdus Thorell, 1895: description of a new species from India, 129 years since the establishment of the genus (Araneae: Salticidae: Ballini). Zootaxa 5448(3): 446-450. .Proszyński 1984a. Atlas rysunków diagnostycznych mniej znanych Salticidae (Araneae). Zeszyty Naukowe Wyższej Szkoły Rolniczo-Pedagogicznej, Siedlce:: 75. All ©copyrights are retained by the original authors and copyright holders, used by their courtesy. COMMENT. Type specimen of this genus (Ligdus chelifer, see above) was illustrated 89 years after collecting original immature specimen, finding adult specimens, necessary for classification, took another 40 years. Simon's suggested classification (strongly seconded by Maddison et. al. based on body appearance resembling genus Bavia (and related), disagree with palps organ - typical for EUOPHRYINES |
Gen. Lokina Yu et Maddison, 2023
Type species Lokina blombergi (11 recognizable species). Compare with other genera in vol. I at Lokina
|
Gen. Lophostica Simon, 1902 Type species Lophostica mauriciana (3 recognizable species). Compare with other genera in vol. I at Lophostica |
|
|
Diversity of internal structures of epigyne in 12 species of Lycidas
Note frequent neglecting of procedures of preparation and documentation of epigyne - resulting in difficulty of species identification. Internal structure of epigyne in Lycidas and related genera differs by shape and proportions of copulatory ducts and spermatheca. This is complementary to color pattern in live specimens, but in similar looking females, especially in specimens long preserved in ethanol, it is the only reliable character. NOTE: These structures can be displayed after simple procedure of removing epigyne from body, clearing soft tissues in 10-20% aqueous solution of KOH for about 24 hours in room temperature, staining with Chlorazol Black E and mounting in a temporary slide in Clove oil (or other liquid making preparation transparent), |
Gen. Mabellina Chickering, 1946
Type species Mabellina prescotti (1 recognizable species). Compare with other genera in vol. I at Mabellina
|
Gen. Macaroeris Wunderlich, 1992 - See informal group 22_EUODENINES Type species Macaroeris nidicolens (8 recognizable species) . Compare with other genera in vol. I at Macaroeris
REMARKS. A puzzling genus with male palp resembling Euophryinae and epigyne characteristic for EUODENINES.
Similar mixture of characters occurs in unrelated Omoedus niger.
|
Gen. Maeota Simon, 1901
Type species Maeota dichrura (10 recognizable species). Compare with other genera in vol. I at Maeota
|
Gen. Muziris Simon, 1901
Type species Muziris doleschalli (3 recognizable species). Compare with other genera in vol. I at Muziris
|
Gen. Naphrys Edwards, 2003
Type species Naphrys acerba (4 recognizable species). Compare with other genera in vol. I at Naphrys
|
Gen. Nebridia Simon, 1902
REMARK. Wholesale merging of genera Nebridia and Amphidraus, proposed by Zhang & Maddison 2015: 22-23 without taxonomic revision, is not acceptable because of insufficient diagnostic documentation available and unresolved diversity of part of species.
Type species Nebridia semicana (1 recognizable species). Compare with other genera in vol. I at Nebridia
|
Gen. Neon Simon, 1876
REMARK. Internal structure of epigyne with spermathecae divided into two spherical chambers and with relatively short and thin ducts, as in type species and similar species, resembles EUOPHRYINES. So is coiled embolus, presumably atop membranous haematodocha. Of the other hand there is considerable diversity among known 20 species of this genus, the loop of spermophor does not resemble typical meander. Phylogentical relationships are therefore uncertain, but identification of the genus is easiest if morphologically placed among EUOPHRYINES.
Diagnostic drawings below are integral part of definition.
Type species Neon reticulatus (20 recognizable species) Compare with other genera in vol. I at Neon
Neon
avalonus +b) ellamae +c) nellii :
Gertsch &
Ivie 1955. Am. Mus. Novit. 1743: 14-15, f 17-20 +b) 4, f 1-4, 6-7 +c) 9-11, 15
+ Paquin P., Duperre N. 2003. Fabreries, Suppl. 11: 197, f 2202-2204. All © copyrights are retained by the original authors and copyrights holders, used by here by their courtesy. .
and copyrights holders, used by here by their courtesy. .
used by here by their courtesy. . |
Gen. Neonella Gertsch, 1936
Type species Neonella vinnula (12 recognizable species). Compare with other genera in vol. I at Neonella
|
Gen. Nicylla Thorell, 1890
Type species Nicylla sundevalli (1 species). Compare with other genera in vol. I at Nicylla Transfer of Nicylla sundevalli to the genus Thiania - not accepted here. |
Gen. Ocnotelus Simon, 1902
Type species Ocnotelus imberbis (1 species) Compare with other genera in vol. I at Semnolius REMARK. Transfered to Semnolius without sufficient documentation by Zhang and Maddison, 2015: 24. |
Gen. Omoedus Thorell, 1881
Type species Omoedus niger (5[?] species */) */ FOOTNOTE. After aborted revolution by Zhang & Maddison,2012, 2015: 26, I accept as Omedus only species accepted by Prószyński, 2017b: 76, and some species described by Szűts et al., 2020: 542. (-) J. Prószyński. |
See reasons for retaining genera Omoedus,
Pystira and Zenodorus.
Body shape and color pattern of Omoedus, Pystira and Zenodorus: SOURCE. Photographs by ©Photo Knowles +©Photo Court +©Photo Whyte. All © copyrights are retained by the original authors and copyrights holders, used by here by their courtesy. . |
>
< Comparison of diagnostic characters of type species of genera Omoedus, Pystira and Zenodorus: SOURCE. Proszynski online. All © copyrights are retained by the original authors and copyrights holders, used by here by their courtesy. . |
|
Gen. "Oningis". Simon, 1901
REMARKS, Two species are left provisionally here, belonging to EUOPHRYINES but not congeneric, pending revision, while their type species is transferred to Jollas, belonging to SITTICINES. Synonyms: Oningis armatus Bryant 1943. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. 92 (9): 495, T. 7, F. 70, 73 Oningis crassus Brya nt 1943. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. 92 (9): 497, T. 6, F. 58, 60, 67
Not congeneric with type species Oningis pompatus = Jollas pompatus, (2 recognizable species) Compare with other genera in vol. I at Oningis COMMENT: WSC explains at the genus Jollas catalog: "N.B.:... Prószyński, 2017: 40 tried to revalidate Oningis, but without its type species." - misinterpretation - I never "revalidate genera" in such situation - I simply quote them following the last used genus name (kept in "quotation marks) without deepening chaos by transferring into next wrong genera - hence listed here as "Oningis" and not "Jollas", delaying decision until somebody will finally revise their placement without transferring into next misplacement In this case Bryant misplaced her species into "Oningis", while WSC places them temporarily into "Jollas" - where they do not fit. |
Gen. Opisthoncana Strand, 1913
Type species Opisthoncana formidabilis (1 recognizable species). Compare with other genera in vol. I at Opisthoncana |
Gen. Orcevia Thorell, 1890
Type species Orcevia keyserlingi (25 species). Compare with other genera in vol. I at Orcevia
Proposal to synonymize Junxattus, Laufeia and Orcevia is inacceptable because of morphology differences in palps and spermathecae
Diagram by Prószyński |
Gen. Panysinus Simon, 1901
Type species Panysinus nicholsoni (1 recognizable? species). Compare with other genera in vol. I at Panysinus |
Gen. Paraeuophrys Logunov, 2020
Type species: Paraeuophrys sumatrana sp. n. (includes 1! species - see below) Compare with other genera in vol. I at Paraeuophrys
Plate 530. A- Paraeuophrys sumatrana. SOURCE: Logunov, D. V. (2020b). New and poorly known leaf-litter dwelling jumping spiders from South-East Asia (Araneae: Salticidae: Euophryini and Tisanibini). Arachnology 18(6): 521-562. COMMENT: Internal structure of epigyne excludes close relationship with Euophrys bryophila
|
Comparison with Euophrys bryophila and diversity of structures of epigyne in representatives of the genus Euophrys
Transfering single species Euophrys bryophila Logunov (below) made error of not considering the whole genus Euophrys containing numerous species with similar internal structure of epigyne (see comparison below), Plate 530. A- . Euophrys bryophila Berry, Beatty & Prószyński, 1996 transfered by Logunov, 2020 to Paraeuophrys bryophila. SOURCE: Berry, J. W., Beatty, J. A. & Prószyński, J. (1996). Salticidae of the Pacific Islands. I. Distributions of twelve genera, with descriptions of eighteen new species. Journal of Arachnology 24: 214-253. Plate 530. A- .Comparison of diversity of internal structures of epigyne in the genus Euophrys (note unsclerotized coiled extension of the sclerotized copulatory duct): A-B - Euophrys frontalis (type species of the genus), C - E. herbigrada, D-E - E. catherinae, F - E. terrestris. SOURCE: A-B - Zabka 1997, C-F - Prószyński, 2003. COMMENT: In view of differeces in spermatheca and duct, the transfer to Paraeuophrys seems unwarranted -
almost spherical shape of spermatheca with semiarching sclerotized duct extended by mebraneous part, ending by coil in the center of window, with central position of the copulatory opening - that is most similar to typical species of European Euophrys (compare drawing of Paraeuophrys sumatrana (above). |
Gen. Paraharmochirus Szombathy, 1915
Type species Paraharmochirus monstrosus. (2 recognizable species). Compare with other genera in vol. I at Paraharmochirus
|
Gen. Parvattus Zhang J., Maddison 2012
Type species Parvattus zhui (1 recognizable species). Compare with other genera in vol. I at Parvattus |
Gen. Pensacola Peckham & Peckham, 1885
Type species Pensacola signata (15 recognizable species). Compare with other genera in vol. I at Pensacola
|
Gen. Pensacolops Bauab, 1983
Type species Pensacolops rubrovittata (1 recognizable species). Compare with other genera in vol. I at Pensacolops |
Gen. Petemathis Prószynski & Deeleman-Reinhold, 2012
Type species Petemathis portoricensis (4 recognizable species). Compare with other genera in vol. I at Petemathis
Decades of studies of Salticidae resulted in a mass of sentimental recollections. Here is one: "..... Perhaps the worst is from your
2012 paper on the Malay Archipelago (see attachment): Not only
do you say you are not competent to study the Caribbean fauna and
then you go ahead and describe a Caribbean genus anyway (in a
paper about fauna from the opposite side of the world!), and you
knew at the time that this particular Caribbean fauna was being
studied by Wayne's student Junxia Zhang who would have
resolved the issue, but you insult all the arachnologists of the
western hemisphere in the process! Such arrogance about a small,
insignificant, practically unknown group of species!......" (Excerpt from my friend - Edwards, G.B." 2014-05-09 21:48). (Explanation from J, Prószyński: That is a reaction to my separation in 2012: 35, f. 30 of five Carribean species from a large SE Asian genus Emathis Simon, 1899 (originally described in that genus by prominent American arachnologist Petrunkevitch, 1930b: 118, 188, f. 97-103 ) after 26 years waiting for correction by my better qualified American colleagues. I have never been informed on research plans of any foreign PhD student, even most attractive ones).
|
Gen. Phasmolia Zhang J., Maddison, 2012
Type species Phasmolia elegans (4 recognizable species). Compare with other genera in vol. I at Phasmolia REMARK. Color pattern (but not genitalic structures) - comparable with Lakarobius!
|
Gen. Popcornella Zhang J., Maddison, 2012
Type species Popcornella spiniformis (4 recognizable species). Compare with other genera in vol. I at Popcornella
|
Gen. Pristobaeus Simon, 1902
Type species Pristobaeus jocosus (9 recognizable species) Compare with other genera in vol. I at Pristobaeus
|
Gen. Prostheclina Keyserling, 1882
Type species Prostheclina pallida (7 recognizable species). Compare with other genera in vol. I at Prostheclina
Prostheclina
[7 species face comparison] +b) amplior +c) basilonesa +d) boreoaitha +e) boreoxantha
+f) bulburin +g) eungella: Richardson, Zabka 2007. Rec.
Australian Mus. 59: 879–96, pl 1-14. All © copyrights are retained by the original authors and copyrights holders, used by here by their courtesy. . |
Gen. Pseudemathis Simon, 1902
Type species Pseudemathis trifida (1 recognizable species). Compare with other genera in vol. I at Pseudemathis |
Gen. Pseudeuophrys Dahl, 1912
Type species Pseudeuophrys erratica ( 9 recognizable species). See more species in vol.1 at Pseudeuophrys
|
Gen. Pseudosynagelides Żabka, 1991 Type species Pseudosynagelides yorkensis.(6 recognizable species) See Pseudosynagelides- Chapter 40 Genera pending placement. |
Gen. Pystira Simon, 1901
Type speciesPystira ephippigera. (1 species) Compare with other genera in vol. I at Pystira |
Recollecting disputes of the past
Omoedus, Pystira and Zenodorus Zhang & Maddison (2012, 2015) discovered that the three above genera constitute single, natural genus they named Omoedus. The comparison by Prószynski, 2017b: 76 (below) convinced general opinion of arachnologist that it is not exactly so.
See reasons for retaining genera Omoedus,
Pystira and Zenodorus.
Body shape and color pattern of Omoedus, Pystira and Zenodorus: SOURCE. Photographs by ©Photo Knowles +©Photo Court +©Photo Whyte. All © copyrights are retained by the original authors and copyrights holders, used by here by their courtesy. . < Comparison of diagnostic characters of type species of genera Omoedus, Pystira and Zenodorus: SOURCE. Proszynski online. All © copyrights are retained by the original authors and copyrights holders, used by here by their courtesy. . |