RETURN TO DATABASE - ALTERNATIVE CLASSIFICATION
SALTICIDAE OF THE WORLD - 0-INDEX of Genera - 01-FOREWORD & KEY to groups of genera! - 02-Comparison - HISTORICAL classification of Aelurilleae - 03-AEURILLINES - 04-AMYCINES- 05-AMYCOIDA VARIA - 06-ASTIAINES - BALLINES - 07-BELIPPINES - 08-CHRYSILLINES - 09-COCALODINES - 10-COLONINES[=Thiodinines] - 11-DENDRYPHANTINES - 12-DIOLENINES - EUODENINES - 13-EUOPHRYINES-PART 0: Introduction-Diversity - 13-EUOPHRYINES-PART 1: Admestina-Donoessus - 14-EUOPHRYINES-PART 2: Echeclus-Pystira - 15-EUOPHRYINES-PART 3: Rhyphelia-Zenodorus - 16-EUPOAINES - 17-EVARCHINES - 18-FOSSILS - 19-HABRONATTINES - 20-HARMOCHIRINES - 21-HELIOPHANINES - 22-HISPONINES - 23-HYLLINES - 24-ICIINES - 25-LAPSIINES - 26-LIGONIPEINES - 27-LYSSOMANINES - 28-MENEMERINES - 29-MYRMARACHNINES - 30-NOTICIINES - 31-PELLENINES - 32-PSEUDICIINES - 33-SIMAETHINES - 34-SITTICINES - 35-SPARTAEINES - 35a-SYNAGELINES - 36-THIRATOSCIRTINAE - 37-YAGINUMAELLINES - 38-YLLENINES - 39-UNCLASSIFIED TEMPORARY
APPENDICES -AP1-Simon's classification - AP2-Petrunkevich synthesis-1928 - AP3-Bonnet's list of subfamilies - AP4-Prószynski's revision of subfamilies 1976 - AP5-Prószynski - summary of results - AP6-Aelurillus black & gray - AP7-Maddison's views on Salticidae phylogeny 2014 - MS1-Omoedus synonymy
MADDISON'S ALTERNATIVE: Tittle_pg Index Introduction Agoriini Aelurillina Asemoneinae Amycini Amycoida-incertae sedis Astiini Ballini Baviini Bredini Chrysillini Cocalodini Dendryphantina Euophryini-1 Euophryini-2 Euophryini-3 Eupoinae Freyina Gophoini Harmochirina Hasariini Hisponinae Holcolaetina Huriini Itatina Lapsiini Leptorchestini Lyssomaninae Marpissina Mopsini Myrmarachnini Nannenini Neonini Onomastinae Plexippina Salticini Sarindini Scopocirini Simaethina Simonellini Sitticini Spartaeina Synagelina Thiodinini Thiratoscirtina Tisanibini Viciriini Salticidae-incertae sedis

Monograph of the Salticidae (Araneae) of the World 1995-2015. Part I: Introduction to alternative classification of Salticidae.

Jerzy Prószyński
14 - EUOPHRYINES-II GROUP OF GENERA
GENERA Echeclus - Pystira
Version July 1st, 2016.
Sources and permissions of illustrations are displayed in the IInd part of the monograph http://www.peckhamia.com/salticidae/

Type genus Euophrys .Interactive index of genera.
EUODENINES - genera intermediate between EUOPHRYINES and DENDRYPHANITNE - test
EUOPHRYINES PART 0 - Introduction and diversity
Euophryinae PART 1 Admestina-Donoessus
Admestina Agobardus Allodecta Amphidraus Anasaitis Antillattus, Araneotanna Aruattus, Asaphobelis, Ascyltus Athamas, Attidops Barraina Bathippus Bathippus-Parabathippus Belliena, Bindax Bulolia Bythocrotus Canama Caribattus Chalcolemia Chalcoscirtus Chalcotropis Chapoda Charippus Cheliferoides, Chinophrys Chloridusa Cobanus, Colyttus Commoris Compsodecta Corticattus Coryphasia Corythalia Cytaea, Descanso Dinattus Donoessus, (334 species)
Euophryinae PART 2 Echeclus-Pystira.
Echeclus Ecuadattus ,Efate, Emathis, Ergane, Euophrys Euryattus, Featheroides, Foliabitus, Frewena, Gen[Jau 34] Hasarina, Hypoblemum Ilargus Jotus Junxattus, Lagnus, Lakarobius, Laufeia, Lechia Lepidemathis, Leptathamas, Lophostica, Lycidas, Mabellina Maeota Maeotella Magyarus, Maileus, Maratus, Marengo Margaromma, Mexigonus Microhasarius Mopiopia, Muziris, Naphrys, Nebridia, Neon Neonella Nicylla, Ocnotelus ,Omoedus, Opisthoncana Orcevia, Parabathippus, Paraharmochirus, Parvattus Pensacola Pensacolops Petemathis Phasmolia Popcornella, Pristobaeus (syn. Palpelius), Prostheclina, Pseudemathis Pseudeuophrys, ,Pseudosynagelides Pystira (393 species)
Euophryinae PART 3 Rhyphelia-Zenodorus .
Rhyphelia, Rumburak Saaristattus, Saitidops, Saitis, Saitissus Salpesia, Saphrys, Semnolius, Servaea Sidusa, Sigytes Siloca, Soesilarishius, Spilargis, Stoidis, Talavera, Tanzania, Tariona, Tarodes, Tatari Thiania, Thianitara Thorelliola Thyenula Tisaniba Truncattus, Tylogonus Udvardya, Variratina, Viribestus, Viroqua, Wallaba Xenocytaea Yimbulunga, Zabkattus, Zenodorus. (327 species).

Gen. Echeclus Thorell, 1890 (2 species)

Type species Echeclus concinnus.
Diagnostic drawings below are integral part of definition.

b)
Echeclus concinnus +b) sokoli: Proszynski 1984c. Atlas ...: 36. .
Prószynski, Deeleman-Reinhold, 2013. Sarawaks. ©Arthr selecta. 22: 124, f. 25-31. By courtesy.

Gen. Ecuadattus Zhang & Maddison, 2012 (4 species)

Type species Ecuadattus typicus.
Diagnostic drawings below are integral part of definition.

Ecuadattus typicus : Zhang J., Maddison 2012. Zootaxa 3578: 13, f 45–52, 136–141. ©Magnolia Press.By courtesy.
Ecuadattus pichincha : Zhang J., Maddison 2012. Zootaxa 3578: 11-13, f 38–44, 132–135. ©Magnolia Press. By courtesy.
b)
Ecuadattus elongatus +b) napoensis :Zhang J., Maddison 2012. Zootaxa 3578: 9-10, f 31–33 +b) 10-11, f 34–37. ©Magnolia Press.

Gen. Efate Berland, 1938 (3 species)

Type species Efate albobicinctus.
Diagnostic drawings below are integral part of definition.

>
Efate albobicinctus : Berry J.W., J.A. Beatty, Proszynski J. 1996. J. Arachnology. 24(3): 223-225, figs 29-35 + ©Zhang J.,
Maddison 2015: Zootaxa 3938 (1): 27, 407-409. © Magnolia Press + ©Photo J. Gardzinska 2004. By courtesy.
b)
Efate fimbriatus +b) raptor: Berry J.W., J.A. Beatty, Proszynski J. 1996. J. Arachnology. 24(3): 225-226, figs 36-39 +b) 227-226,
figs 40-46. By courtesy.

Gen.Emathis Simon, 1899 (5 species)

Type species Emathis weyersi.
Diagnostic drawings below are integral part of definition.

+ +
Emathis weyersi : Proszynski 1984c. Atlas ...: 374 (Luzon, Mt. Makiling, Baker) + Zabka 1985. Ann.zool.
39, 11: 214, ff. 106-108 (sp? Vietnam)+ © Photo C P. Koomen.. By courtesy.
+b) +
Emathis sumatranus +b) coprea : Prószynski, Deeleman-Reinhold 2012: Arthr. selec. 21(1): 35-36, f 23-33
+ ©Zhang J., Maddison 2015: Zootaxa 3938 (1): 32, f 892-893. © Magnolia Press +b) Proszynski 1984c. Atlas ...: 37
+ Atlas ...: 74. By courtesy.
+
Emathis makilingensis : Proszynski (holotype) + Barrion, Litsinger 1995. 49-50, figs 18a-f.. By courtesy.
+
Emathis gombak [MISPLACED] : Zhang, Maddison 2012. Zootaxa: 3581: 57, f 13–18, 102–103. By courtesy.
+
Emathis armillata (syn, Cyrba a.) [females - 2 species!] : Wanless 1984b. Bull. brit. Mus. nat. Hist. (Zool.), 47 (7): 468- 470, ff. 14A-I.. By courtesy.

Gen. Ergane Koch L., 1881 (5 species)

Type species Ergane cognata.
Diagnostic drawings below are integral part of definition.

+b)c)
Ergane cognata +b) insulana +c) madagascariensis: Davies, Zabka 1989. 27 (2): 214, t. 24 + Koch L. 1881: 1261, pl 108, f 3
+b) 1265, pl 108, f 5 +c) Peckhams 1885a: 34, plate 1, fig 7. By courtesy.
Ergane carinata: Berry, Beatty, Proszynski 1996. J. Arachnology. 24(3): 228-228, figs 47-53. By courtesy.
Ergane benjarei: Zabka M. 1988b. Ann. zool., 41 (14): 454, ff. 87-90. By courtesy.

Gen. Euophrys Koch C.L., 1834 (63 species)

Type species Euophrys frontalis.
Diagnostic drawings below are integral part of definition.

+
++
+
Euophrys frontalis : Zabka 1997. Fauna Polski 19. Zabka 1997: 46, figs 89-98 + ©Painting by Aart Noordam
+ ©Zhang J., Maddison 2015: Zootaxa 3938 (1): 29, f 463-467 [conspecific?] © Magnolia Press+©Photo B. Knoflach
+ J. Lissner.. By courtesy.
++
Euophrys sulphurea : Proszynski Internet + Metzner H. 1999. Andrias 14: 51-52, 168, table 17a-h
+ Logunov 1997b. Bull. British Arachn. Soc. 10 (9): figs 33-35 +©Photo J. Lissner. By courtesy.
b)c)
Euophrys nigritarsis +b) baliola +c) canariensis : ©Photo J. Lissner +b) Simon, 1937: 1172, 1251, fig. 1340
+c) Wunderlich. 1987: 277-278, f 681. . . By courtesy.
a)b)
c)
d)
Euophrys nigripalpis? : ©Photo A. Henrard +a) male, live +b) preserved in alcohol +c) female, live +d) palps and epigyne.
b)+
Euophrys terrestris +b) : + Proszynski Internet +b) Metzner 1999: 53, 172, table 18 l-m + ©Photo Heiko Metzner. By courtesy.
++
Euophrys rufibarbis : Proszynski, Internet + Metzner 1999. Andrias 14: 51, 170, table 16a-k +©Photo B. Knoflach. By courtesy.
Euophrys catherinae : Proszynski. 2003a. Ann. zool.:: 48-49, figs 158-162.flavoater By courtesy.
+
Euophrys flavoater : Proszynski 1971a: 211-213, figs 13-15 + Logunov et al. 1993. 30: 108, ff. 5b, 6a, 7a, 8a-d, 9a-c.. By courtesy.
b)b)
Euophrys gambosa +b) nearctica +c) uralensis : Proszynski. 2003a. Ann. zool.: 49-51,figs 163-170, 174-176, 182-183, 188-189,
194-195 +b) Proszynski - Internet +c) Logunov 1997b. Bull. British Arachn. Soc., 10 (9): figs 36-38 . By courtesy.
Euophrys pseudogambosa : Proszynski. 2003a. Ann. zool.: 51-52, figs 173, 177-181, 186-189, 192-193. By courtesy.
++
Euophrys semiglabrata: Heciak, Proszynski 1984a. Ann. zool., 37, 14: 378-379, ff. 1-14 + Barrientos et al., 2014. Rev. Iber. 25: 36, f 15-17. By courtesy. [Placement uncertain: internal structure of epigyne resembles Habrocestum + palpal organ Pseudeuophrys, abdominal pattern rather Euophrys] .
+++
Euophrys herbigrada : Proszynski 1991: 498-502, figs ff. 1335.1-2 + P. Merrett 1995. Nwsl. Br. arachn. Soc. 73: 4-5, f 1
+ Locket, Millidge 1951: 223, ff. 111 d. By courtesy.
b)
Euophrys acripes +b) bryophila : Proszynski Internet +b) Berry, Beatty, Prószyński, 1996 J. Arachn. figs 63-69 (placement?).
b)
Euophrys kororensis +b) wanyan : Berry, Beatty, Prószyński, 1996. J. Arachn. 24(3): figs 59-62 +b) figs 54-58. By courtesy.
Euophrys menemerella +b) minuta : Proszynski J. 1987: 24 [E. minuta = Lechia minuta-Q]. By courtesy.
b)+
+
Euophrys nearctica +b) monadnock: (a+b) Proszynski 2015, Internet + Paquin P., Duperre N. 2003. Fabreries, Suppl. 11: 194,
figs 2166-2168 + ©Zhang J., Maddison 2015: Zootaxa 3938 (1): 29, f 860-861. © Magnolia Press. By courtesy.
Euophrys sp [Israel] : Proszynski. 2003a. Ann. zool.: 53-54, figs 184-185, 190-191, 196-197 Zabka 1997: 46, figs 89-98.
b)c)
Euophrys declivis +b) dhaulagirica +c) evae: Zabka in Prószyński 2009b. Arhr. sel. 18(3-4): f 32-33 +b) Zabka M. 1980b. Senck. biol., 60 (5/6): 365-366, f 13-14 +c) Zabka M. 1981a. 61 (5/6): 409-410, f 4-6. By courtesy.
+b)
Euophrys everestensis +b) yulungensis: Wanless 1975. 3 (5): 134-135, f. 4-5, 9-11 +b) Zabka 1980b. Senck. biol., 60 (5/6):
363-365, f. 12.. By courtesy.
Euophrys omnisupertes : Wanless F.R. 1975.Bull. Brit. Arachnol. Soc., 3 (5): figs 1-3, 6-8.. By courtesy.
b)c)d)
Euophrys poloi +b) cooki +c) nepalica +d) kawkaban : Zabka 1985. Ann. zool. 39, 11: 219-220, ff. 151-160 +b) 219, ff. 149-150 +c) Zabka 1980b. Senck. biol., 60 (5/6): 363, ff. 10-11 +d) Wesolowska W., van Harten A. 2007. F. Arabia, 23: 6-9, f 12-16. By courtesy.
+
Euophrys kataokai : Ikeda H. 1996a. A. Arachn. 44, 1: 33, f 16-29 + Ono, Ikeda, Kono 2009: 583, f 277-281. By courtesy.
++b)
Euophrys uphami +b) talassica :Proszynski J. 1987a. Atlas ...: 101 + Wesołowska 2012a: 20(2): 326-327, 6–8
+ Peckhams 1903. 14 (1): 214, t. 23, f 1-1a-c +c) Logunov D.V. 1997b. Bull. British Arachn. Soc., 10 (9): 348-349,
figs. 17, 23-26 . By courtesy.
b) c)
Euophrys kirghizica +b) turkmenica +c) proszynskii : Logunov 1997b. Bull. Brit. Arachn. Soc. 10 (9): figs. 17-22
+b) 349-350, figs. 17, 27-32.+c) Logunov , Cutler, Marusik 1993. Ann. Zool. Fenn., 30: 113, f. 5C, 12A-E, 13A-C
+Logunov D.V. 1992c: 76 f. 29. By courtesy. 01/1870_sima.jpg
b)c)d)e)
Euophrys alabardata +b) kittenbergeri c) alticola + d) melanoleuca e) sima [ALL MISPLACED] : Caporiacco L., di 1947c :  236, f 69 +b) fig 68 +c) Denis 1955: 147, f. 2-4 (or 1957: f. 10) +d) Galiano M.E. 1962b. plate 2, figs 12-13 +e) Chamberlin 1916. 60 (6): 298 T. 25 F. 1. By courtesy.
b)c)d)e)
Euophrys albopalpalis +b) bulbus +c) atrata d) namulinensis +e) nangqianensis : Bao, Peng 2002 Zool. stud. 41 (4):
404-405, f 6-10 +b) 406-407, f 11-14 +c) Song et al., 1999: 509, figs 293A, 325F +d) Hu J, 2001: 382, f. 239.1-3
+e) 383, f. 240.1-3. By courtesy.
b)+
Euophrys pulchella +b) purcelli + c) : Peckhams 1893. 699, figs 7-a +b) 201, T. 22 F. 5 + Wesołowska 2012a: 20(2):
325-326, f 1-5. By courtesy.
Euophrys bifida : Wes., Azar., Rus.-Smith, 2014. Zootaxa 3789 (1): 11-12, f 7-17.. ©Magnolia Press. By courtesy.
Euophrys cochlea : Wes., Azar., Rus.-Smith, 2014. Zootaxa 3789 (1): 12-13, f 18-33. ©Magnolia Press. By courtesy.
Euophrys elizabethae : Wes., Azar., Rus.-Smith, 2014. Zootaxa 3789 (1): 13, f 34-39. ©Magnolia Press. By courtesy.
Euophrys falciger : Wes., Azar., Rus.-Smith, 2014. Zootaxa 3789 (1): 18, f 47-54. ©Magnolia Press. By courtesy.
Euophrys gracilis-2 [preoccupied] : Wes., Azar., Rus.-Smith, 2014. Zootaxa 3789 (1): 18, f 47-54. ©Magnolia Press. By courtesy.
Euophrys griswoldi [misplaced?] : Wes., Azar., Rus.-Smith, 2014. Zootaxa 3789 (1): 18-19, f 55-60. ©Magnolia Press.
++
Euophrys leipoldti [misplaced?]: Wes., Azar., Rus.-Smith, 2014. Zootaxa 3789 (1): 18, f 47-54. ©Magnolia Press. + Peckham
1903. tab. 22, figs. 6.
b)
Euophrys limpopo +b) maseruensis (Chalcoscirtus?) : Wes., Azar., Rus.-Smith, 2014.
Zootaxa 3789 (1): 23, f 71-73 +b) 23, f 74-77. ©Magnolia Press. By courtesy.
Euophrys meridionalis [misplaced?] : Wes., Azar., Rus.-Smith, 2014. Zootaxa 3789 (1): 24-27, f 78-86. ©Magnolia Press.
Euophrys miranda [misplaced?] : Wes., Azar., Rus.-Smith, 2014. Zootaxa 3789 (1): 27-28, f 87-89. ©Magnolia Press.
b)
Euophrys nana [misplaced?] +b) recta : Wes., Azar., Rus.-Smith, 2014. Zootaxa 3789 (1): 28-29, f 90-95
+b) 29, f 96-99. ©Magnolia Press. By courtesy.
Euophrys subtilis : Wes., Azar., Rus.-Smith, 2014. Zootaxa 3789 (1): 18, f 47-54. ©Magnolia Press. By courtesy.

Gen. Euryattus Thorell, 1881 (12 species)

Type species Euryattus porcellus.
Diagnostic drawings below are integral part of definition.

+
c)
Euryattus bleekeri : Proszynski 1984c: 44 [N Guinea: Andai No.1812, coll. Thorell]
+ Davies Todd, Zabka. 1989. . 27 (2): 228, t. 32 +c) © Photo R. Whyte.
Euryattus bleekeri = Plotius curtus [conspecif.?] : Proszynski J. 1987: 78, 107 [Type Plotius curtus]
b)
c)
Euryattus ventralis +b) venustus +c) comparison : Proszynski 1984c: 47 [N Guinea: Andai No.1812, Thorell, Mus. Stockhom]
b) Proszynski 1984c: 47 +c) Prószyński, Deeleman-Reinhold, 2013 ©Arthr selecta. 22(2): 131-132, f 83-84 -COMPARISON
of 3 EPIGYNE. By courtesy.
b)
Euryattus porcellus: Proszynski 1984c: 45 [Type: N Guinea: Ins. Yule (Roro) No. 1814] +b) ©Photo B. Patoleta (MNHN-Paris).
b)c)
Euryattus junxiae +b) kinabalus +c) myiopotami : Prószyński, Deeleman-Reinhold, 2010. Arthropoda selecta, 19(3): 165, f 54-58
+b) 2013. ©Arthr selecta. 22(2): 128, f 48-55+c) Prószyński 1984c: 44, 46. By courtesy.
>
Euryattus koomeni : Prószyński, Deeleman-Reinhold, 2013 ©Arthr selecta. 22(2): 128-131, f 56-69. ©Photo P. Koomen.
+
Euryattus pengi : Prószyński, Deeleman-Reinhold, 2013 ©Arthr selecta. 22(2): 131, f 70-82. + ©Photo P. Koomen.. By courtesy.
>
Euryattus wallacei : Det. and photo by ©R. Whyte. By courtesy.
b)c)
Euryattus albescens +b) nigriventris +c) leopoldi: Keyserling 1881, p 1299, pl 111, f 1 +b) 1293, pl 110, f 6 +c) Roewer, 1938: 92, f. 70-72.

Gen. Featheroides Peng, Ying, Kim 1994 (2 species)

Type species Featheroides typica.
Diagnostic drawings below are integral part of definition.

b)
Featheroides typica +b) yunnanensis : Peng, Ying, Kim 1994: 2-3, f 1-3 +b) 3-4, figs 4-6. By courtesy.

Gen. Foliabitus Zhang J., Maddison, 2012 (2 species)

Type species Foliabitus longzhou.
Diagnostic drawings below are integral part of definition.

Foliabitus longzhou : Zhang J, Maddison 2012. Zootaxa: 3581: 3581: 60. f 19-27. By courtesy.
Foliabitus scutigerus : Zabka 1985. Annales zoologici, 39, 11: 235, ff. 255-258. By courtesy.

Gen. Frewena Richardson, 2013 (1 species)

Type species Frewena maculata .
Diagnostic drawings below are integral part of definition.

Frewena maculata : Richardson 2013. Zootaxa 3716 (3): 466-467, f 10, 18-24.. © 2013 Magnolia Press. By courtesy.

Gen. Gen [AUS-958-961] Whyte, 0 = Maratus sceletus Otto & Hill, 2015a: 16.

Gen. Gen[Jau 34] Gasnier, 0 (1 species)

Type species Gen[Jau 34] sp [tged34].
Diagnostic drawings below are integral part of definition.

Gen[Jau 34] sp [tged34] :Brasil: Amazonas: Parque Nac. do Jau. ©Photo Gasnier & Azevedo. By courtesy.
Analogous tuft of black, short setae in front of spinnerets in Stagetilus semiostrinus from Malaysia.

Gen. Hasarina Schenkel, 1963 (1 species)
placement doubtful

Type species Hasarina contortospinosa.
Diagnostic drawings below are integral part of definition.

>
Hasarina contortospinosa : Wesolowska 1981b: 132-133, f 10-13 +Peng, Xie, Xiao 1993: 44, 83-84, f 254-263. By courtesy.

Gen. Hypoblemum Peckham, Peckham, 1886 (4 species)

Type species Hypoblemum villosum.
Diagnostic drawings below are integral part of definition.

Hypoblemum villosum + ? : Keyserling 1882: 1421, t 120, f 34 + ©Photo: R.Whyte. By courtesy.
Hypoblemum albovittatum : Zabka, Pollard 2002a. Rec.Canter. Mus. 16: 64-72, f 1-15 + ©Photo R. Whyte. By courtesy.
++
Hypoblemum parvulum : ©PhotoR. R. Jackson + ©Photo R. Whyte + Bryant,1935. 16: 90 pl X f 6. By courtesy.
++
Hypoblemum sp [Brisb] + sp [metamorph] : ©Photo R. Whyte [male, female before and after metamorphosis]. By courtesy.
Hypoblemum sp : ©Zhang J., Maddison 2015: Zootaxa 3938 (1): 29, f 497-499. © Magnolia Press. By courtesy.

Gen. Ilargus Simon, 1901 (6 species)

Type species Ilargus coccineus.
Diagnostic drawings below are integral part of definition.

>+
b)
Ilargus coccineus +b) macrocornis : Galiano 1963b. Physis, 23 (66): 377-378, t. 20, f 11- 12. + Edwards, Rinaldi , Ruiz 2005. Biota Neotr. 5(2): 25, f 29-30 +©Zhang J., Maddison 2015: Zootaxa 3938 (1): 25, f 289-295. © Magnolia Press +b) Zhang J., Maddison 2012. Zootaxa 3578: 18-19, f 67-70, 144. ©Magnolia Press. By courtesy.
b)+
Ilargus foliosus +b) galianoae : Zhang J., Maddison 2012. Zootaxa 3578: 16, f 53–59 +b) 16, f 60-66+ + © Zhang J., Maddison 2015. Zootaxa 3938 (1): f 779. By courtesy.
Ilargus pilleolus : Zhang J., Maddison 2012. Zootaxa 3578: 20-21, f 75–83, 142–143 + ©Zhang J., Maddison 2015:
Zootaxa 3938 (1): 25, f 650, 781. ©Magnolia Press. By courtesy.
Ilargus moronatigus : Zhang J., Maddison 2012. Zootaxa 3578: 19-20, f 71–74. © Magnolia Press.By courtesy.
Ilargus serratus : Zhang J., Maddison 2012. Zootaxa 3578: 21, f 84–91. ©Magnolia Press.By courtesy.

Gen. Jotus Koch L., 1881 (? species)

Type species Jotus auripes ? .
REMARK. Genera Jotus, Hypoblemum, Lycidas, Maratus, Saitis and probably some related, require taxonomic revision of ALL species. Their definitions are unclear and incomplete, due to fragmentary knowledge of their morphology and biology. The practice of wholesale transfer of large number of species, following their incidentally designated type species, creates chaos. These genera are closely related, which is demonstrated by structure of their palps and spermathecae. Newly described Jotus remus differs strikingly by "paddle" shaped bunch of setae on tarsus and metatarsus III and by abdominal pattern.

Jotus remus : Otto & Hill, 2016a Peckhamia: 133.1: 7, f. 8-34 holotype male, paratype female. Australia. By courtesy.

Gen. Junxattus Prószyński, Deeleman-Reinhold, 2012 (1 species)
proposal to synonymize Junxattus, Laufeia and Orcevia is inacceptable because of morphology differences in palps and spermathecae

Type species Junxattus daiqini. Diagnostic drawings below are integral part of definition.

+
Junxattus daiqini : Prószyński, Deeleman-Reinhold, 2012. Arthr. select. 21(1): 40-41, f 66-70 + ©Zhang J., Maddison 2015: Zootaxa 3938 (1): 30, f 510-516. 871-871. © Magnolia Press By courtesy.. By courtesy.

Gen. Lagnus Koch L., 1879 (3 species)

Type species Lagnus longimanus.
Diagnostic drawings below are integral part of definition.

>>>
Lagnus longimanus + edwardsi : Koch L., 1879: 1074, t 94, f 4. + Wanless 1988. NZeal.j.zool.15: 160, f 39a-i
+ Zhang J., Maddison 2012. Zootaxa: 3581: 60-62, f 28-33. By courtesy.
>
Lagnus monteithorum : Patoleta 2008. ©Genus 19(4): 718-720, f. 1-8. By courtesy.

Gen. Lakarobius Berry, Beatty, Prószyński, 1998 (1 species)

Type species Lakarobius alboniger.
Diagnostic drawings below are integral part of definition.

Lakarobius alboniger : Berry, Beatty, Proszynski 1998. J. Arachn. 25(2): 162-164, figs 36-43.By courtesy.

Gen. Laufeia Simon, 1889 (5 species)
proposal to synonymize Junxattus, Laufeia and Orcevia is inacceptable because of morphology differences in palps and spermathecae

Type species Laufeia aenea.
Diagnostic drawings below are integral part of definition.

++
Laufeia aenea : Bohdanowicz A., Proszynski J. 1987. Ann.zool. 41, 2: 74-76, ff. 84-89. + ©Ono, Ikeda, Kono. Salti. Japan, Tokai Univ. Press, 2009: 585, pl 48-9 + ©Zhang J., Maddison 2015: Zootaxa 3938 (1): 30, f 504-508. © Magnolia Press By courtesy.
Laufeia concava [Placement uncertain]: Zhang J., Maddison 2012. Zootaxa: 3581: 62-63, f 34–42, 104–105. By courtesy.
Laufeia eximia [MISPLACED!] : Zhang J., Maddison 2012. Zootaxa: 3581:64, f 43–52 + ©Ono, Ikeda, Kono. Salti. Japan, Tokai Univ. Press, 2009: 585, pl 48-9. By courtesy.
b)
Laufeia sasakii +b) aerihirta: ©Ono, Ikeda, Kono. Salti. Japan, Tokai Univ. Press, 2009: 585, f 304-307 +b) Bryant 1935. Records of Canterbury Museum: 89, t 12 , f 22. By courtesy.

Gen. Lechia Zabka, 1985 (2 species)

Type species Lechia squamata .
Diagnostic drawings below are integral part of definitions.

b)c)
d)e)
Lechia minuta +b) squamata +c) squamata? - female by Logunov +d) COMPARED WITH types of Laufeia aenea male and female + e) unknown male misidentified as "Lechia squamata" : Proszynski J. 1992b. Ann. zool., 44, 9: 172-173, f 30-32 +b) Zabka 1985. Annales zoologici, Warszawa, 39, 11: 236, f 259-262 +c) female by Logunov, Jaeger 2015: RUS. ENT. J., 24(4): 355-357, f 33-39 +d) Laufeia aenea - TYPE from : Bohdanowicz A., Proszynski J. 1987. Annales zoologici, 41, 2: 74-76, ff. 84-89 +e) male by Logunov, Jaeger 2015: RUS. ENT. J., 24(4): 355-357, f 33-39. By courtesy.
Something very wrong: female identified by Logunov, Jaeger 2015 is apparently Lechia, but there are no reason to transfer it to Laufeia, (epigyne is different, its internal structure was not studied by any researcher to preserve type speciemen, the only female specimen known!), there are no premises to match it with male, which differs from Laufeia aenea by significant details of palp. J. Prószyński.
Dr. D.V. Logunov offered following comments about genus Lechia (personal letter,2015-12-20): "Lechia minuta is not a published combination and it is presented in your database without any justification or explanation to be referrred to as your personal opinion. I reckon this is one of the reasons why the WSC does not refer to it. For the time being, this taxon is better to retain as Euophrys minuta (the original combination), until the male is found and decribed."

Gen. Lepidemathis Simon, 1899 (6 species)

Type species Lepidemathis sericea.
Diagnostic drawings below are integral part of definition.

>+
++
Lepidemathis sericea : Proszynski J. 1987. Atlas ...: 21 (11385 Ematholepis sericea ES. Manila - coll. Simon,). + ©Photo P. Koomen + ©Zhang J., Maddison 2015: Zootaxa 3938 (1): 32, f 584-589. © Magnolia Press. By courtesy.
b)
Lepidemathis haemorrhoidalis +b) unicolor :Zabka 1988b. Ann. zool. 41 (14): 459, ff. 101-104 +b) Prószyński 2009b. Arhr. sel. 18(3-4): f 36-39 [drawn by M.Zabka] (placement uncertain) . By courtesy.
Lepidemathis gottliebi : © Freudenschuss & Seiter, 2014. Philipines: Samar. . By courtesy.
Lepidemathis politori : © Freudenschuss & Seiter, 2014. Philipines: Samar. By courtesy. By courtesy.
+
Lepidemathis astorgasensis : Proszynski -quick ketches of type specimens + Barrion, Litsinger 1995. 47-49, figs 17a-k.

Gen. Leptathamas Balogh, 1980 (1 species)

Type species Leptathamas paradoxus.
Diagnostic drawings below are integral part of definition.

Leptathamas paradoxus : Szuts T. 2003c. Folia ent. hung. 64: 47-49, figs 9-15, 25, 28, 31, 34, 37 + photos
+ Balogh P. 1980c. Folia Ent. Hung. 41: 29-31, f 1-6 + ©Zhang J., Maddison 2015: Zootaxa 3938 (1): 27,
f 364-371, 820-821. © Magnolia Press. By courtesy. ATTENTION: - comparable [?] with Athamas.

Gen. Lophostica Simon, 1902 (3 species)

Type species Lophostica mauriciana.
Diagnostic drawings below are integral part of definition.

Lophostica mauriciana : Duhem, Ledoux, Wesolowska 2005. Genus, 16(4): 527-536, f 1-24. By courtesy.
b)
Lophostica minor +b) nova : Ledoux, 2007. Rev. Arachn., 17(2): 22, f 11D, 16A-B +b) 20-22, f 3F, 11B-C, 15A-E . By courtesy.

Gen. Lycidas Karsch, 1878 (20 species)


Type species Lycidas - vacant -after transfer of the original type species L. anomalus to Maratus.
REMARKS. The species below are left provisionally in Lycidas, until taxonomic revision (this is NEW! procedure outside Nomenclatorical Codex, but apparently reasonable one, limiting repeated transfers of whole lists of nominal species).
REMARKS 2. Genera Jotus, Hypoblemum, Lycidas, Maratus, Saitis and probably some related, require taxonomic revision of ALL species. Their definitions are unclear and incomplete, due to fragmentary knowledge of their morphology and biology. The practice of wholesale transfer of large number of species, following their incidentally designated type species, creates chaos. These genera are closely related, which is demonstrated by structure of their palps and spermathecae, their behavioral mark is signaling during courtship (and other encounters) by lifting third pair of legs and abdomen,. Following brilliant observations by J. Otto genus Maratus enrich display by spreading lateral flaps of abdomen ("wings"), however Lycidas anomalus, type species of genus Lycidas has not such flaps - so its reclassification to Maratus is disputable - but it forces transfers of large number of Lycidas species, about whose behavior we know nothing.
DIAGNOSIS. Absence of white third tarsus of legs in males (proposed provisional difference with Maratus and related genera).
Diagnostic drawings below are integral part of definition.
DESCRIPTIONS. REFERENCES. COMPOSITION

+
+
Lycidas auripes : Davies Todd, Zabka 1989. Mem. Queens. Mus., 27 (2): 238, 244, t. 46 + ©Photo Otto, Hill 2012b. Peckhamia 103(1): 5-7, f [plates] 2-6 + [as Jotus a.] ©Zhang J., Maddison 2015: Zootaxa 3938 (1): 29, f 491-496.© Magnolia Press. By courtesy.
b)
Lycidas anomaliformis +b) bitaeniatus: Zabka M. 1987b. Ann. zool., 40, 1: 473-474, ff. 52-55 +b) 458-460, ff. 23-24. By courtesy.
b)c)d)
Lycidas braccatus +b) chlorophtalmus +c) griseus +d) heteropogon : Zabka M. 1987b. Ann. zool., 40, 1: 464-465, ff. 34-37 +b) 477-478, ff. 60-61 +c) 457-458, ff. 19-22 +d) 474-475, ff. 56-57. By courtesy.
b)c)
Lycidas karschi +b) kochi +c) minutus : Zabka M. 1987b. Ann. zool., 40, 1: 468-469, ff. 44-45 +b) 460, f 25-26 +c) 478, ff. 62-63478, ff. 62-63. By courtesy.
+
Lycidas michaelseni : Zabka M. 1987b. Ann. zool., 40, 1: 462, f 8, 25. + Davies Todd, Zabka 1989. Mem. Queens. Mus., 27 (2): 238, t. 45 + ©Photo R. Whyte. By courtesy.
Lycidas scutulatus : Zabka M. 1987b. Ann. zool., 40, 1: 460-462, ff. 27-28 + ©Photo R. Whyte. By courtesy.
b)c)
Lycidas nigriceps +b) obscurior +c) piliger : Zabka M. 1987b. Ann. zool., 40, 1: 470, ff. 46-47 +b) 467-468, ff. 42-43 +c) 463-464, ff. 32-33. By courtesy.
b)
Lycidas pilosus +b) sp : Zabka M. 1987b. Ann. zool., 40, 1: 475-476, ff. 58-59 +b) Davies Todd, Zabka 1989. Mem. Queens. Mus., 27 (2): 239, t. 41.. By courtesy.
b)c)d)
Lycidas vittatus +b) cf vittatus +c) frosti +d) furvus: Proszynski 1984c. Atlas ...: 56 +b) ©Photo R. Whyte +c)Peckhams 1901b. 13 (1): 332, t 25, f 12; T. 26 F. 9 +d) Song D. et al. 1999: 533, figs 302L. By courtesy. By courtesy.

Gen. Mabellina Chickering, 1946 (1 species)

Type species Mabellina prescotti.
Diagnostic drawings below are integral part of definition.

+>
Mabellina prescotti : Maddison 1996. .Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. 154 (4): 332, f 63 + Chickering 1946. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. Harvard 97: 68-72, figs 52-57. By courtesy. + ©Photo G. B. Edwards, 2001. By courtesy.

Gen. Macaroeris Wunderlich, 1992

Type species Macaroeris nidicolens.
REMARKS. A puzzling genus with male palp resembling Euophryinae and epigyne characteristic for EUODENINES. Similar mixture of characters occurs in unrelated Omoedus niger.

Gen. Maeota Simon, 1901 (4 species)

Type species Maeota w-ti.
Diagnostic drawings below are integral part of definition.

Maeota sp.: Maddison 2015. Journal of Arachnology. 43: 231–292, f. 111 [identification?]. By courtesy.
++
Maeota dichrura : Galiano 1963b. Physis, 23 (66): 387, t. 25, ff. 16-18 + Simon 1901a: 567, figs 680 (=F) ZhangJ., Maddison 2012. Zootaxa 3578: 24, f 92–95. ©Magnolia Press + ©Zhang J., Maddison 2015: Zootaxa 3938 (1): 22, f 204-208. © Magnolia Press. By courtesy.
Maeota dorsalis : ZhangJ., Maddison 2012. Zootaxa 3578: 24, f 92–95. ©Magnolia Press. By courtesy.
b)
Maeota [?] simoni +b) flava : Zhang J., Maddison 2012. Zootaxa 3578: 25, f 99–101, 145 +b) 25-26, f 96–98. ©Magnolia Press.

Gen. Maeotella Bryant, 1950 (1 species)

Type species Maeotella perplexa.
Diagnostic drawings below are integral part of definition.

Maeotella perplexa :Peckham + Peckham, 1901. Attidae found in Jamaica.: 7, 8, 12, t 3, f 8. By courtesy.

Gen. Magyarus Zabka 1985 (1 species)

Type species Magyarus typicus.
Diagnostic drawings below are integral part of definition.

Magyarus typicus :Zabka 1985. Ann. zool. 39, 11: 237-238, f 268-271. By courtesy.

Gen. Maileus Peckham, Peckham, 1907 (1 species)

Type species Maileus fuscus.
Diagnostic drawings below are integral part of definition.

+
Maileus fuscus : "Maileus fuscus Peck.Sarawak. Type 4312." - quick sketch M. Zabka - Proszynski Internet 2003b]
+ ©Zhang J., Maddison 2015: Zootaxa 3938 (1): 29, f 500-503. © Magnolia Press By courtesy.

Gen. Maratus Karsch, 1878 (18 species)

Type species Maratus amabilis.
REMARKS. Genera Jotus, Hypoblemum, Lycidas, Maratus, Saitis and probably some related, require taxonomic revision of ALL species. Their definitions are unclear and incomplete due to fragmentary knowledge of their morphology and biology. The practice of wholesale transfer of large number of species, following their incidentally designated type species, creates chaos. These genera are closely related, which is demonstrated by structure of their palps and spermathecae, their behavioral mark is signaling during courtship (and other encounters) by lifting third pair of legs and abdomen,. Following brilliant observations by J. Otto genus Maratus enrich display by spreading lateral flaps of raised abdomen ("wings"), however Lycidas anomalus, type species of genus Lycidas has not such flaps - so its reclassification to Maratus is disputable - but it forces transfers of large number of Lycidas species, about whose behavior we know nothing.
DIAGNOSIS. Group of genera waving third pairs of legs during display has, as a correlated character, white third tarsus in males, among these genera Maratus itself is recognizable by strickingly colored dorsal surface of abdomen, with erectible abdominal lateral flaps.
Diagnostic drawings below are integral part of definition..

+
Maratus amabilis :Zabka M. 1987b. Annales zoologici, 40, 1: 479, ff. 64-66 + Otto, Hill 2011c. Peckhamia 96.1: 1-3, pl 1-3. By courtesy.
Maratus anomalus : RECLASSIFIED Proszynski 1984c. Atlas ... 159 (Holotype,No. 1771. Mus. Berlin) + Otto, Hill 2012b. + ©Peckhamia 103(1): 23-31, f [plates] 28-38 [seems to have no flaps!].. By courtesy.
+
Maratus chrysomelas : Zabka M. 1987b. Ann. zool., 40, 1: 457-458, ff. 19-22 + Otto, Hill 2012b. ©Peckhamia 103(1): 32, f [plate] . By courtesy.
Maratus harrisi : Otto, Hill 2012b. ©Peckhamia 103(1): 4-9, pl 4-10. By courtesy.
Maratus linnaei : Otto, Hill 2012b. © Peckhamia 96.1: 10-11, pl 11-12. By courtesy.
Maratus mungaich : Otto, Hill 2012b. © Peckhamia 96.1: 12-13, pl 13-14. By courtesy.
+
Maratus nigromaculatus : Zabka M. 1987b. Ann. zool., 40, 1: 456-457, ff. 17-18 + Otto, Hill 2012b. ©Peckhamia 103(1): 103(1): 33, f [plate] 40 [seems to have no flaps!]. . By courtesy.
+
Maratus pavonis : Otto, Hill 2012b. ©Peckhamia 103(1):89.1: 2-15, pl 2. . By courtesy.
Maratus purcellae : Otto, Hill 2013.NS Wales, Peckhamia 105.1: 1-8, pl 1-6. . By courtesy.
Maratus rainbowi : Hill, Otto, 2011. Sydney. Peckhamia 89.1: 2-15, pl 3. . By courtesy.
Maratus robinsoni : Otto, Hill 2012b. ©Peckhamia 103(1): 36-42, f [plates] 43-51. . By courtesy.
Maratus sp C [Tasmania: Stanley] : Otto, Hill 2011c. ©Peckhamia 96.1: 24, pl 29. By courtesy.
Maratus speciosus : Otto, Hill 2012b. © Peckhamia 103(1): 42-46, f [plates] 52-59. By courtesy.
Maratus speculiferus : Zabka M. 1987b. Ann. zool., 40, 1: 465-466, ff: 38-41 + .Otto, Hill 2012b. © Peckhamia 103(1): 47, f [plate] 60. By courtesy.
Maratus spicatus : Otto, Hill 2012b. © Peckhamia96.1: 12-13, pl 13-14. By courtesy.
Maratus velutinus : Otto, Hill 2012b. ©Peckhamia 103(1): 51-55, f [plates] 67-69. By courtesy.
Maratus vespertilio : Otto, Hill 2011c. Peckhamia 96.1: 17-18, pl 21-22.. By courtesy.
+++
Maratus volans : J. Proszynski 1984c. Atlas ...: 126 + Zabka M. 1987b. Ann. zool., 40, 1: 479-481, ff. 67-69 + Simon E. 1901a. 559, figs 675-682 (C-E) + ©Photo M. Stevens 2011 + Otto, Hill 2011c. Peckhamia 96.1: 12-13, pl 13-14. By courtesy.
Maratus jactatus : Otto, 2015. S Queensland 2015. ©Photo J. Otto. By courtesy. By courtesy.
Maratus sceletus : Otto & Hill , 2015. Peckhamia.Otto, 2015. S Queensland 2015. By courtesy.
Maratus proszynski : Waldock, 2015. Otto, 2015. Rec. W.Austral. Mus. 30: 144-150, f 1-9. ©Photo J. Otto. By courtesy.
ATTENTION. More new species are discovered and displayed in the Internet, almost daily, and will presumably be described in due course. Interested Arachnologists are advised to watch for these new information.

Gen. Margaromma Keyserling, 1882 (1 species)

Type species Margaromma funesta.

>>>>>>>
Margaromma funesta [Type species] : Davies T.., Zab. 1989. Mem. Queen.Mus., 27 (2): 230, t. 38 + Keyserling 1882: 1347, t 114, f 5, 6.By courtesy.

Gen. "Margaromma" [?] (2 species)

Type species ? ?.
Diagnostic drawings below are integral part of definition.

b)
Margaromma [Misplaced] soligena b) nitida [MISPLACED]: Zabka 1988b. Ann. zool., 41 (14): 462-463, ff. 110- 113 +b) Proszynski J. 1984c. Atlas ...: 79 . By courtesy.
Margaromma semirasa = Omoedus semirasus by Zhang J., Maddison 2015: 26 = Zenodorus semirasus by: Proszynski 2015

Gen. Marma Simon, 1902 - see - COLONINES[syn. Thiodininae]

Gen. Mexigonus Edwards, 2003 (4 species)

Type species Mexigonus minutus.
Diagnostic drawings below are integral part of definition.

++
Mexigonus minutus :F.P.-Cambridge 1901: 202, 208, 212, t. 15, f. 14+Edwards G.B. 2002a. 16(1-3): 70, f 9-12 + ©Phot. D. Richman. By courtesy.
+b)
Mexigonus morosus +b) dentichelis : Peckham E.G. 1888: 71 T. 1 F. 53; T. 5 F. 53 +b) F.P.-Cambridge 1901: 202, 208, 212, t. 15, f. 14. By courtesy.
+
Mexigonus arizonensis : Gertsch 1935. Amer. Mus. Novit. 792: 30, f. 38-39 + ©Zhang J., Maddison 2015: Zootaxa 3938 (1): 24, f 250-256. © Magnolia Press. By courtesy.
+
Mexigonus sp-Ecuador + sp-Mexico: ©Zhang J., Maddison 2015: Zootaxa 3938 (1): 24, f 766-767 + 769. © Magnolia Press.

Gen. Microhasarius Simon, 1902 (1 species)

Type species Microhasarius pauperculus.
Diagnostic drawings below are integral part of definition.

>
Microhasarius pauperculus : Proszynski J. 1987. Atlas ...: 67 + Simon 1903a: 823, f 966-968.

Gen. Mopiopia Simon, 1902 (3 species)

Type species Mopiopia comatula.
Diagnostic drawings below are integral part of definition.

b)
Mopiopia comatula +b) labyrinthea :Galiano 1963b. Physis: 397-398, t. 28, f 3-6 + Edwards, Rinaldi, Ruiz 2005. Biota Neotr. 5(2): 25, f 31-34, 56-57. By courtesy.
Mopiopia tristis : Edwards, Rinaldi, Ruiz 2005.Biota Neotr. 5(2): 26, f 35-36, 58. By courtesy.
b) c)
d)
Tariona = Mopiopia gounellei +b) bruneti +c) sp +d) cf bruneti : Galiano 1963b. Physis, 23 (66): 454-455, t 39, f 7-10 +b) 452-454, t 39, f 4-6 +c) ©Photo Gasnier & Azevedo +d) ©Zhang J., Maddison 2015: Zootaxa 3938 (1): 20, f 169-172 [as Mopiopia].
©Magnolia Press. By courtesy.
b)
Tariona = Mopiopia mutica +b) albibarbis : Galiano 1963b. Physis, 23 (66): 454-455, t 39, f 7-10 +b) Edwards, Rinaldi, Ruiz 2005. Biota Neotropica 5(2): 27, f 37-39. By courtesy.

Gen. Muziris Simon, 1901 (3 species)

Type species Muziris doleschalli.
Diagnostic drawings below are integral part of definition.

b)
Muziris doleschalli +b) calvipalpis : Proszynski 1984c. Atlas ...: 86 (Ambon) +b) Keyserling E. 1883 1453, t 122, f 7 [placement?]. By courtesy.
+
Muziris wiehlei [Misplaced - Chrysillinae?] : Berland, 1938: 146, Figs 43-46 +©Photo B. Patoleta. By courtesy.

Gen. Naphrys Edwards, 2003 (3 species)

Type species Naphrys acerba.
Diagnostic drawings below are integral part of definition.

b)
++
Naphrys acerba +b) bufoides : Edwards G.B. 2002a. Insecta Mundi 16 (1-3): 69, f 5-8 +b) Richman 1981: 204, f. 5, 20-23 + ©Photo G. B. Edwards + ©Zhang J., Maddison 2015: Zootaxa 3938 (1): 18. f 732-733 © Magnolia Press. By courtesy.
+++
+
Naphrys pulex : Proszynski 1987. Atlas ...: 14 + Paquin, Duperre 2003. Fabreries, Suppl. 11: 195, figs 2175-2177 + Peckham E.G. 1909. 16 (1): 525, pl. 42, f. 11, pl. 43, f. 1 + ©Photo D.E. Hill + ©Zhang J., Maddison 2015: Zootaxa 3938 (1): 18. f 138-142, 730-731 © Magnolia Press. By courtesy.
++
Naphrys xerophila : Richman 1981: 203, f. 4, 16-19 + ©Photo Edwards + ©Zhang J., Maddison 2015: Zootaxa 3938 (1): 18. f 138-142, 7728-729 © Magnolia Press. By courtesy.

Gen. Nebridia Simon, 1902 (3 species)
REMARK. Wholesale merging of genera Nebridia and Amphidraus, proposed by Zhang & Maddison 2015: 22-23
without taxonomic revision, is not acceptable because of insufficient diagnostic documentation available and
unresolved diversity of part of species.

Type species Nebridia semicana .
Diagnostic drawings below are integral part of definition.

b)c)
Nebridia semicana +b) manni +c) mendica : Galiano 1963b. Physis, 23 (66): 401, t 27, f 15-18 +b) Bryant 1943. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. 92 (9): 492, t. 5, f. 48 +c) 494, t 6, f 62, 65. By courtesy. ATTENTION. Nebridia semicana seem to be both misplaced [=Amphidraus?] and not congeneric with N. mendica and N. manni.

Gen. Neon Simon, 1876 (20 species)

Type species Neon reticulatus.
REMARK. Internal structure of epigyne with spermathecae divided into two spherical chambers and with relatively short and thin ducts, as in type species and similar species, resembles EUOPHRYINES. So is coiled embolus, presumably atop membranous haematodocha. Of the other hand there is considerable diversity among known 20 species of this genus, the loop of spermophor does not resemble typical meander. Phylogentical relationships are therefore uncertain, but identification of the genus is easiest if morphologically placed among EUOPHRYINES. Diagnostic drawings below are integral part of definition.

+
Neon reticulatus : Snazell et al. 1999. Bull. Brit. Arach Soc. 11, 6: 251-254, f 5-8 + Logunov 1998. Bull. Brit. Arachn. 11 (1): 17, f 13-14 + ©Photo J. Lissner. By courtesy.
b)c)+
Neon avalonus +b) ellamae +c) nellii : Gertsch & Ivie 1955. Am. Mus. Novit. 1743: 14-15, f 17-20 +b) 4, f 1-4, 6-7 +c) 9-11, 15 + Paquin P., Duperre N. 2003. Fabreries, Suppl. 11: 197, f 2202-2204. By courtesy.
b)c)d).
Neon pixii +b) plutonus +c) kovblyuki +d) muticus: Gertsch W. J. & W. Ivie 1955. Am. Mus. Novit. 1743: 15-17, ff. 21-24 +c) Logunov 1998. Bull. Brit. Arachn. 11 (1): 33-34, f 1-6 +d) Proszynski 1976: 187, f 444-445.. By courtesy.
+
Neon levis : Lohmander H. 1945. Göteborgs K. Vetensk. Samh. Handl. (6) 3B(9): 66-74, ff. 63-68 + Zabka . 1997. Fauna Polski 19: 5-187, f 222-227 + Proszynski 1979. Ann. zool. 34 (11): 314, f 224-226 . By courtesy.
?+
Neon rayi : Proszynski J. 1976.: 187, f 438-443,+ Metzner H. 1999. Andrias 14: 66, 185, table 31a-g. By courtesy.
?+
Neon valentulus : Lohmander H. 1945. Göteborgs K. Vetensk. Samh. Handl. (6) 3B (9): 59-66, f 57-62 + Zabka M. 1997. Fauna Polski 19: 5-187, f 234-238. By courtesy.
+
Neon robustus : Lohmander H. 1945. Göteborgs K. Vetensk. Samh. Handl. (6) 3B(9): 59-66, f 57-62 + Zabka M. 1997. Fauna Polski 19: 5-187, f 234-238. . By courtesy.
+
Neon minutus : Zabka M. 1985. Ann. zool., 39, 11: 420-421, f 372-377+ Logunov D.V. 1998. Bull. British Arachnol. Soc. 11 (1): 20-21, f 5, 6, 11, 12, 19, 25, 29, 34-41. By courtesy.
b)
Neon wangi : Peng X., Li S. 2006a. A. zootax. sinica, 31: 127, f 1-4 . By courtesy.
+b)
Neon ningyo +b) nojimai : Ono, Ikeda & Kono, 2009: 587, f. 329-336 + Peng X, Gong L., Kim J. 2000. Korean J. Soil Zool. 5 (1): 13-14, f 1-4 +b) Ikeda H. 1995a. Acta Arachnologica, 44, 1: 33, f 18-24, 49. By courtesy.
b)
Neon zonatus+b) kiyotoi : Bao Y.H., Peng X.J. 2002. Zoological Studies 41 (4): 408-409, f 19-21 +b) Ono, Ikeda & Kono, 2009: 585, f 315-322.. By courtesy.
Neon sumatranus : Logunov D.V. 1998. Bull. British Arachnol. Soc. 11 (1): 21, f 1-2, 8-10, 16-17, 23, 42-48. By courtesy.
Neon australis : Richardson 2013. Zootaxa 3716 (3): 468-469, f 25-30. © 2013 Magnolia Press. By courtesy.
Neon taylori : Richardson 2013. Zootaxa 3716 (3): 470-471, f 30–37. By courtesy.
Neon [NOT - misplaced] sp [rainforest] Foster B., 0 [UNPUBLISHED] : Australia: Queensland: Mooloolah Valley. © Photo Brodie Foster. By courtesy.

Gen. Neonella Gertsch, 1936 (12 species)

Type species Neonella vinnula.
Diagnostic drawings below are integral part of definition.

b)++
c)
Neonella lubrica +b) vinnula +c) sp : Galiano M.E. 1988b. Revue suisse Zool., 95 (2): 441, f 2-7, 15, 20 +b) 443, f 13, 18 + Ruiz, Brescovit, Freitas 2007 Rev. brasil. Zool. 24(3): 276, f 17 +b) © and phot by G. B. Edwards 2001+ ©Zhang J., Maddison 2015: Zootaxa 3938 (1): 24, f 257-263 +c) 738-739. © Magnolia Press. By courtesy.
b)
Neonella antillana +b) cabana : Galiano M.E. 1988b. 95 (2): 444, ff. 1, 8-10 +b) Galiano 1998c. J. Arachnology. 26: 15-16, ff. 4-6, 11, 12. .By courtesy.
b)c)
Neonella colalao+b) mayaguez +c) montana : Galiano M.E. 1988b. Revue suisse Zool., 95 (2): 443, f 13, 18 +b) Galiano 1998c. J. Arachnology. 26: 15, f 2-3 +c) 447, f 14, 21. By courtesy.
+
Neonella minuta : Galiano M.E. 1988b. Revue suisse Zool., 95 (2): 439, f 17, 19 +b) Galiano M.E. 1965b. Rev. Soc. Ent. Arg., 27 (1-4): 25-28, f 1-8. By courtesy.
b)
Neonella nana +b) camillae : Galiano M.E. 1988b. Revue suisse Zool., 95 (2): 443, f 13, 18443, f 11-12, 16, 22-23 +b) Edwards 2002b. Insecta Mundi 16 (1-3): 157-160, f 1-6..By courtesy.
b)c)
Neonella noronha [Misplaced!] +b) compared with tip of embolus of N. vinnula +c) salafraria [Misplaced!] : Ruiz, Brescovit, Freitas 2007 Rev. brasil. Zool. 24(3): 273-276, f 12-16 +b) 276, f 17 +c) Ruiz, Brescovit 2004. Revta Ibérica Aracnol. 10: 281-283, f 1-5. By courtesy.

Gen. Nicylla Thorell, 1890 (1 species)
Transfer of Nicylla sundevalli to the genus Thiania - not accepted here.

Type species Nicylla sundevalli.
Diagnostic drawings below are integral part of definition.

Nicylla sundevalli : Proszynski 1968c. Annales zoologici. 26: 244-246, f 9-13. By courtesy.

Gen. Ocnotelus Simon, 1902 (1 species)
transfer to Semnolius by Zhang and Maddison, 2015: 24.

Type species Ocnotelus imberbis.
Diagnostic drawings below are integral part of definition.

Ocnotelus imberbis : Galiano 1963b. Physis, 23 (66): 415, t 31, f 1-4. By courtesy.

Gen. Omoedus Thorell, 1881(4 species)
see reasons for retaining genera Omoedus, Pystira and Zenodorus.
Comparison of diagnostic characters of Omoedus, Pystira and Zenodorus: Proszynski 2011: Internet
+b) photographs of the same: ©Photo Knowles + Court + Whyte. By courtesy.

Type species Omoedus niger.
Diagnostic drawings below are integral part of definition.

Omoedus niger : Ramoi Il. off N Guinea. TYPE: coll. Thorell, Mus Genova. Proszynski J. 1971c. Ann. zool. 28: 172-173, f 28-33 [Shouldn't this species be placed in EUODENINES? Pending study of palp!]+ © Photo D. Knowles (Ceram). By courtesy..
Omoedus insultans [by male palp, cf. Omoedus niger ? by spermatheca] : Hęciak, Prószynski 1984b: 411, f 2, 5, 10. By courtesy.
b)c)d)
Omoedus kochi +b) torquata +c) doreyana +d) sexualis: Proszynski 1984c. Atlas ...: 81 +b) Atlas ...: 81 +c) Atlas ...: 81 +d) Heciak, Proszynski J. 1984b. Ann. zool., 37, 17: 411-416, ff. 1, 4, 7-9. By courtesy.
Omoedus kulczynskii : Proszynski J. 1971c. Ann. zool. 28: 177-179, f 43-44 . By courtesy.
++
Omoedus piceus : Proszynski J. 1971c. Ann. zool. 28: 173-175, f 34-40 + Simon 1901 644, f. 762-764[=.E, "E2", G] + ©Zhang J., Maddison 2015: Zootaxa 3938 (1): 26, f 339 342, 800. © Magnolia Press. By courtesy.
Omoedus cordatus [MISPLACED] : Berry J.W., J.A. Beatty, Proszynski J. 1996. Journal of Arachnology. 24(3): 242-243, f 103-105.4. By courtesy.
Omoedus sp [dav] [MISPLACED] : Davies, Zabka, 1989. Mem. Queensland Mus., 27 (2): 231, t 34. By courtesy.

Gen. "Oningis" Simon, 1901 (2 species
left temporarily in this genus, after transfer of their type species to Jollas, pending proper placement)

Type species Oningis pompatus = Jollas pompatus.
Diagnostic drawings below are integral part of definition.
Synonymy: Oningis armatus Bryant 1943. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. 92 (9): 495, T. 7, F. 70, 73
Oningis crassus Brya nt 1943. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. 92 (9): 497, T. 6, F. 58, 60, 67 .
Transfer to Jollas: Galiano, 1991b: 16 - unclear.

+b)
MISPLACED in "Jollas" syn. Oningis armatus +b) crassus : Bryant 1943. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. 92 (9): 495, T. 7, F. 70, 73 + 497, T. 6, F. 58, 60, 67 . By courtesy.

Gen. Opisthoncana Strand, 1913 (1 species)

Type species Opisthoncana formidabilis.
Diagnostic drawings below are integral part of definition.


Opisthoncana formidabilis :Proszynski J. 1984c. Atlas ...: 96. By courtesy.

Gen. Orcevia Thorell, 1890 (6 species)
proposal to synonymize Junxattus, Laufeia and Orcevia is inacceptable because of morphology differences in palps and spermathecae

Type species Orcevia keyserlingi.
Diagnostic drawings below are integral part of definition.

Orcevia keyserlingi : Proszynski 1984c: 73-74, 76 + Prószynski, Deeleman-Reinhold 2012. Arthr. select. 21(1): 50, f 113-115, 120-122 + ©Zhang J., Maddison 2015: Zootaxa 3938 (1): 517-522, 657, 866-87. ©Magnolia Press.
b)
Orcevia kuloni +b) sp [Borneo] : Prószynski, Deeleman-Reinhold 2012. Arthr. select. 21(1): 52-53, f 108-103
+b) ©Photo P. Koomen. By courtesy.
b)c)
Orcevia eucola +b) perakensis : Proszynski 1984c: 73-74, 76 +b) Proszynski 1987:60 [from Perak] +c) Quick sketch by Zabka [from Java: Buitenzorg, Mus. Hamburg]. By courtesy.
b)
Orcevia proszynskii +b) "aenea" [Japan - male only] : Song, Zhu. Chen 1999: 532, figs 302K +b) Yaginuma 1986a: 240, f 133.3p [NOTE]. By courtesy.

Gen. Panysinus Simon, 1901 (1 species)

Type species Panysinus nicholsoni..
Diagnostic drawings below are integral part of definition.

Panysinus nicholsoni : Simon 1937. 1244, 1272, f 2027-2028. By courtesy.

Gen. Parabathippus see near BATHIPPUS

Gen. Paraharmochirus Szombathy, 1915 (2 species)
placement DIOLENINES?

Type species Paraharmochirus monstrosus.
Diagnostic drawings below are integral part of definition.

b)
Paraharmochirus monstrosus +b) tualapaensis : Szombathy 1915. Ann. hist.-nat. Mus. nat. 13: 489, f 13 +b) Zhang J., Maddison 2012.Zootaxa 2012b: 36-39, f 170-182. By courtesy.

Gen. Parvattus Zhang J., Maddison 2012 (1 species)

Type species Parvattus zhui.
Diagnostic drawings below are integral part of definition.

+
Parvattus zhui : Zhang J., Maddison 2012. Zootaxa: 3581: 70-71, f 75-80 + ©Zhang J., Maddison 2015: Zootaxa 3938 (1): f 653. © Magnolia Press. By courtesy.

Gen. Pensacola Peckham & Peckham, 1885 (15 species)

Type species Pensacola signata.
Diagnostic drawings below are integral part of definition.

b)+
Pensacola signata +b) murina : F. P.-Cambridge 1901 : 220, t. 18, f 7 +b) Galiano 1963b. Physis, 23 (66): 419-420, t 33, f 6-9 + Simon 1903a. 674, f 796-798 (= A-D). By courtesy.
b)c)d)
Pensacola castanea +b) cyaneochirus +c) gaujoni +d) ornata : Galiano 1963b. Physis, 23 (66): 416-417, t 32, f 3-5 +b) 417-418, t 31, f 5-7 +c) 418-419, t 33, f 4, 5 +d) 420, t 32, f 20. By courtesy.
b)c)
Pensacola radians +b) sylvestris +c) electa : F. P.-Cambridge 1901 : 220, t 18, f 9 +b) 220, t 18, f 8 +c) Bryant 1943. 92 (9): 504, t 7, f 72, 74, 76 +d) 506, t 6. f 59; t 7, f 75, 77). By courtesy.
b)c)
Pensacola maxillosa +b) montana +c) peckhami : Bryant 1943. 92 (9): 504, t 7, f 72, 74, 76 +b) 510, t 8, f 81-82 +c) 512, t 8, f 83, 85-86. By courtesy.
b)
Pensacola poecilocilia +b) tubercolotibiata: Ruiz, Brescovit 2005b. Revta bras. Zool. 22: 756, f 9-10 +b) 756, f 11-12. By courtesy.

Gen. Pensacolops Bauab, 1983

Type species Pensacolops rubrovittata Bauab, 1983.

Pensacolops rubrovittata: Bauab, 1983: 2, f. 1-5. By courtesy.

Gen. Petemathis Prószynski & Deeleman-Reinhold, 2012 (4 species)

Type species Petemathis portoricensis.

++
Petemathis portoricensis : Petrunkevitch, 1930b: 118,f 97-103.+ Prószynski, Deel.-Rein. Arthr. sel. 2012: 21(1): 54-55, f 189, 192, 196 + ©Zhang J., Maddison 2015: Zootaxa 3938 (1): f 85-90, 700-701. © Magnolia Press. By courtesy.
b)+
+
Petemathis luteopunctata +b) minuta : Prószynski, Deel.-Rein. Arthr. sel. 2012: 54-55, f 187, 194 +b) 54-55, f 190-191 + ©Zhang J., 2012 PhD THESIS. UNIV. BRIT. COLUMBIA + ©Zhang J., Maddison 2015: Zootaxa 3938 (1): f 698-699. © Magnolia Press. By courtesy.
++
Petemathis tetuani : Petrunkevitch, 1930b: 118,f 97-103.+ Prószynski, Deel.-Rein. Arthr. sel. 2012: 54-55, f 188, 199, 197 + ©Zhang J., Maddison 2015: Zootaxa 3938 (1): f 702-703. © Magnolia Press. By courtesy.

Gen. Phasmolia ZhangJ., Maddison, 2012 (1 species)

Type species Phasmolia elegans.

Phasmolia elegans : Zhang J., Maddison, 2012b:Zootaxa 3491: 39-41, f 183-195. C 2012 . Magnolia Press. Bycourtesy. Color pattern - compare Lakarobius!

Gen. Popcornella Zhang J., Maddison, 2012 (4 species)

Type species Popcornella spiniformis.
Diagnostic drawings below are integral part of definition.

Popcornella spiniformis :Zhang J., Maddison. Zootaxa 3476: 44-45, f 211–223. ©Magnolia Press. By courtesy.
Popcornella furcata [congeneric?] : Zhang J., Maddison. Zootaxa 3476: 40-41, f 191–200. ©Magnolia Press. By courtesy.
Popcornella nigromaculata [congeneric?] :Zhang J., Maddison. Zootaxa 3476: 44-45, f 211–223. ©Magnolia Press. By courtesy.
Popcornella yunque [congeneric?] :Zhang J., Maddison. Zootaxa 3476: 45-46, f 224–233. ©Magnolia Press. By courtesy.

Gen. Pristobaeus Simon, 1902 (9 species)

Type species Pristobaeus jocosus.
Diagnostic drawings below are integral part of definition.

>+
Pristobaeus jocosus : . Proszynski 1987. Atlas ...: 81 (Sulawesi) + Proszynski 2003b: Internet (Sulawesi) + ©Zhang J., Maddison 2015: Zootaxa 3938 (1): 27, f 424-430 © Magnolia Press. By courtesy.
++
++
Pristobaus (syn. Palpelius) beccari : Proszynski 1984c: 96-97 (Coll. Thorell) + Davies, Zabka 1989. Mem. Queensland Mus., 27 (2): 230, t 39+ ©Photo C P. Koomen + ©Zhang J., Maddison 2015: Zootaxa 3938 (1): 27, f 431-437 + 648-651. © Magnolia Press .+ Photo Schneider-Freudenschuss. Type species of Palpelius . By courtesy.
b)++
Pristobaus (syn. Palpelius) dearmatus +b) discedens : Proszynski 1984c: 98 +b) 1984c: 98 +c) ©Photo M. Freudenschuss [Type -Mus. Wien].
++
Pristobaus (syn. Palpelius) namosi : Berry, Beatty, Proszynski 1996. J. Arachnology. 24(3): 243-244, f 106-110.
b)c)
Pristobaus (syn. Palpelius) sp. [Sempata] +b) trigyrus +c) taveuniensis : Proszynski 2003b: Internet [Sulawesi, Sempata- coll. Deeleman] +b) Berry, Beatty, Prószyński, 1996: 24(3): 245-246, f 111-113 +c) Patoleta 2008b Genus 19(4): 722-725, f 1-5.
b)
Pristobaus (syn. Palpelius) vanuaensis +b) vitiensis: Patoleta 2008b Genus Vol. 19(4): 726, f. 6-8, 13, 15
+b) 726, f. 9-12, 14. By courtesy.
+b)
Pristobaeus clarus +b) fuscoannulatus : Roewer, 1938: 86,f. 65-66 +b) Strand, 1911d: 187, pl. 4, f. 17, pl. 6, f. 88. By courtesy.

Gen. Prostheclina Keyserling, 1882 (7 species)

Type species Prostheclina pallida.
Diagnostic drawings below are integral part of definition.

++
+
Prostheclina pallida : Davies Todd V., Zabka M. 1989. Mem. Queensland Mus., Brisbane, 27 (2): 238, t 44 +b) Richardson, Zabka 2007. Rec. Australian Mus. 59: 84-86, 2, 4a-i, 5; t 1 + ©Photo M. Stevens in R. Whyte +Otto, Hill 2012b. Peckhamia 103(1): 7-8, f [plate] 7. By courtesy.
b)c) d)
e)f) g)
Prostheclina [7 species face comparison] +b) amplior +c) basilonesa +d) boreoaitha +e) boreoxantha +f) bulburin +g) eungella: Richardson, Zabka 2007. Rec. Australian Mus. 59: 879–96, pl 1-14. By courtesy.

Gen. Pseudemathis Simon, 1902 (1 species)

Type species Pseudemathis trifida.
Diagnostic drawings below are integral part of definition.

Pseudemathis trifida : Duhem, Ledoux, Wesolowska 2005. Genus, 16(4): 527-536, f 12-24. By courtesy.

Gen. Pseudeuophrys Dahl, 1912 (8 species)

Type species Pseudeuophrys erratica.
Diagnostic drawings below are integral part of definition.

++
+
Pseudeuophrys erratica : Zabka 1997. F. Pol.. 19: 5-187, f 265-271+ Logunov 1998b. Rev. Arachn. 12(11): 115, f. 1-7, 9, 12, 17-20, 23, 25-26, 33-34 + ©Photo H. Metzner +J. Lissner + ©Zhang J., Maddison 2015: Zootaxa 3938 (1): f 469-473. © Magnolia Press. By courtesy.
Pseudeuophrys lanigera : Heciak, Proszynski 1984a. Ann. zool.: 379-389, f 15-24 + ©Photo H. Metzner +J. Lissner. By courtesy.
Pseudeuophrys iwatensis: Proszynski 1979: Ann. zool. 306, f 64-68 + Bohdanowicz, Proszynski 1987. Ann. zool. 41, 2: 49-53, f 18-26.. By courtesy.
+
b)
Pseudeuophrys obsoleta +b) pascualis : Proszynski 1979. Ann. zool.34: 307, f 78-83. + Zabka 1997. F. Pol. 19: 5-187, f 272-277 + ©Photo J. Lissner +b) Proszynski 2003. Ann. zool.: 146, f 198-199. By courtesy.
+
Pseudeuophrys vafra : Proszynski Internet + ©Photo J. Lissner. By courtesy.
Pseudeuophrys nebrodensis : Alicata, Cantarella 2000. Mem. Soc. ent.. ital. 78 (2): 491-492, f 1-6 By courtesy.

Gen. Pseudosynagelides Żabka, 1991(6 species)
see TEMPORARILY UNCLASSIFIED

Gen. Pystira Simon, 1901 (1 species)
see reasons for retaining genera Omoedus, Pystira and Zenodorus.

Comparison of diagnostic characters of Omoedus, Pystira and Zenodorus:
Proszynski online +b) photographs of the same: ©Photo Knowles + Court + Whyte. By courtesy.

Type species Pystira ephippigera.
Diagnostic drawings below are integral part of definition.

+
Pystira ephippigera : Proszynski 1984c. Atlas ...: 117 ("20334 ... Java" coll. Simon) + ©Zhang J., Maddison 2015: Zootaxa 3938 (1): f 343-349, 801-802 (as "Omoedus"). © Magnolia Press. By courtesy.