RETURN TO DATABASE - ALTERNATIVE CLASSIFICATION
SALTICIDAE OF THE WORLD - Abstract - INDEX of Genera - FOREWORD & KEY to groups of genera! - AEURILLINES - Comparison HISTORICAL classification of Aelurilleae - AMYCINES- AMYCOIDA VARIA - ASTIAINES - BELIPPINES - CHRYSILLINES - COCALODINES - COLONINES [=Thiodinines] - DENDRYPHANTINES - DIOLENINES - EUOPHRYINES-PART 1 Introduction-Donoessus- EUOPHRYINES-PART 2 Echeclus-Pystira - EUOPHRYINES- PART 3 Rhyphelia-Zenodorus - EUPOAINES - EVARCHINES - FOSSILS - HABRONATTINES - HARMOCHIRINES - HELIOPHANINES - HISPONINES - HYLLINES - ICIINES - LAPSIINES - LIGONIPEINES - LYSSOMANINES - MENEMERINES - MYRMARACHNINES - NOTICIINES - PELLENINES - PSEUDICIINES - SIMAETHINES - SITTICINES - SPARTAEINES - THIRATOSCIRTINAE - YAGINUMAELLINES - YLLENINES - UNCLASSIFIED TEMPORARY - Maddison's views on Salticidae phylogeny 2014 - Omoedus synonymy
OUT OF DATE CLASSIFICATORY SYSTEMS -Simon's classification - Petrunkevich synthesis-1928 - Bonnet's list of subfamilies - Prószynski's revision of subfamilies 1976.
Monograph of the Salticidae (Araneae) of the World 1995-2014
Introduction to alternative classification of Salticidae

Classification of the Salticidae genera of the World
group of genera

AELURILLINES

by Jerzy Prószyński
Version December 31st, 2015

Disclaimer,This is a work in progress, continually being developed and revised. Proposed taxonomic names included here are not valid unless subsequently published in accepted taxonomic papers. Note on illustrations. This introduction to classification of Salticidae includes only species defined by diagnostic illustrations in the taxonomic literature, arranged by similarities of embolus and spermophor. Images are displayed as thumbnails to save space and allow for rapid scanning of theoretically closely-related species. Thumbnails are small versions of illustrations in other parts of the monograph, whera are displayed together with particulars of their sources and permissions.

Gen. Phlegra Simon, 1876 (77 species)

Type species Phlegra fasciata.
DIAGNOSIS. Confront to general characteristics of AELURILLINES which have the whole bulbus covered by opaque sclerotized tegulum and a coil of embolus hidden behind anterior part of tegulum, from where only its tip protrudes. Bulbus usually ends posteriorly by sharp pointed triangle, sometimes with narrow "tail". There is often also a small, conical protuberance ("bump") on tegulum. Tibial apophysis is short and robust, sometimes sclerotized and hook like, often accompanied dorsally by fleshy protuberance. Female epigyne, usually in a form of sclerotized flat plate, with indistinct, small copulatory openings, but often with sclerotized "wings" or edges, sclerotized chambers of spermathecae in a form of a pair of compact bodies with convoluted internal chambers, or a chain of irregular chambers. Copulatory ducts are sclerotized, or short and indistinct, even invisible.
Phlegra departs from the above definition
by shape of epigyne and spermatheca, and also by tibial apophyses. Epigyne is plate-like, with two large, oval, or distorted oval-like depressions. Copulatory openings are hidden under anterior rim of depression, ducts run ahead, often funnel-like, next passing into sclerotized spermathecae, which are bent sausage shaped, with numerous internal chambers. The ducts and spermathecae are comparable in several genera, but length of spermathecae different: in Asianellus (spermathecae short), Phlegra (spermathecae of middle length) and Langona (spermathecae very long), the number of internal chamber being proportional to the length of spermatheca. In males tibial apophysis consist of two rami separated by a narrow gap, in species in which both rami are pointed the dividing gap is narrow, "V" shaped and, incidentally, their embolus is longer and stretches outside tegulum along groove on tip of cymbium. In species in which dorsal ramus is blunt, the gap is broader, "U" shaped, its walls are parallel, tip of embolus is flattened plate-like, shorter and broader. In species with black cymbium the observation of shape of black, sclerotized tibial apophysis may be difficult and require separation of cymbium from tibia. Body color pattern includes either prominent white stripe along abdomen and two stripes along thorax, or is gray with two lines of darker spots along abdomen. The clypeus is striking by having contrasting white setae. Diagnostic drawings below are integral part of definition.

++
+
Phlegra fasciata : Zabka 1997. Fauna Polski 19: 5-187, f 259-264 + Azarkina 2003. Rev. Arachn. 14, (6): 87-90, f 110, 118, 120-121 + Logunov 1996d. Genus, 7 (3): 544-547, f 1, 2, 17-26 + ©Photo J. Lissner. By courtesy.
Phlegra bresnieri : Logunov 1996e. Genus, 7 (3): 562-564, f 4-5, 26, 74-80 + ©Photo J. Lissner. By courtesy.
+
Phlegra hentzi : Logunov D.V., Kopponen S. 2002. Bull. British arachn. Soc. 12 (6): 264-267, f 1-8 + Kaston 1948. Bull. Conn. St. geol. nat. Hist. Surv. 70: 460-461, t 90, f 1669-1674.. By courtesy.
b)
Phlegra amitaii +b) dimentmani: Proszynski. 2003a. Ann. zool. 53, 1: 125, f 507-509 +b) 125-125, f 524-525. By courtesy.
b)c)
Phlegra ferberorum +b) v-epigynalis +c) levyi : Proszynski 2003a. Ann. zool: 53, 1: 128-129, f 534-535 +b) 135, f 530-531 +c) 129-130, f 526-527. By courtesy.
b)+
Phlegra shulovi +b) palestinensis : Proszynski 2003a. Ann. zool: 53, 1: 133-134, f 528-529 +b) 130-131, f 726-728 + Logunov 1996. Arthr. Sel., 5 (1/2): 61-62, f 8-14.. By courtesy.
b)
Phlegra jacksoni +b) rothi : Proszynsk 2003a. Ann. zool: 53, 1 : 129, f 516-518 +b) 132, f 519-521. By courtesy.
+b)
Phlegra pori +b) fulvastra: Proszynski 2003. Ann. zool: 53, 1: 131-132, f 532-533 +b) 128-129, f 534-535. By courtesy.
Phlegra particeps : Proszynski 2003a. Ann. zool: 53, 1: 131, f 510-515 By courtesy.
b)c)
Phlegra samchiensis+b) sp. cf.particeps [Bhutan] +c) thibetana[2 sp?] : Proszynski J. 1978a. Ent. bas.,Basel, 3, 7: 12-14, f 11-13 +b) : 11-12, f 7-10 +c) 14-15, f 14-18 (third drawing of epigyne - posterolateral view). By courtesy.
Phlegra stephaniae : Proszynski 2003a. Ann. zool: 53, 1: 134-135, f 549-554. By courtesy.
b)+
Phlegra tillyae +b) yaelae : Proszynski 2003a. Annales zoologici. 53, 1: 135, f 543-548 +b) 135, f 536-542 + Azarkina 2003. Revue Arachn. 14, (6): 103-104, f 110, 119, 122-123. By courtesy.
b)c)
Phlegra tetralineata +b) sp ? +c) soudanica: Proszynski 1987. Atlas ...: 77 +b) Azarkina 2003. Rev.Arachn., 14, (6): 103-104, figs 110, 119, 122-123 [misidentified] +c) Logunov D. V., Azarkina G.N. 2006. Rev. Suisse zool., 113(4): 739-241, f 54-55.
b)
Phlegra andreevae +b) bicognata:Azarkina 2003. Rev. Arachn., 14, (6): 75-78, f 9-10, 15-16, 29-31, 36.+b)78-5-78, f 42-43, 57-60,76-79, 97-100, 102. . By courtesy.
+b)
Phlegra sp. : Wesolowska, van Harten 2007, 23: 242-244, f 149-©Photo Phot by B. Knoflach. By courtesy.
b)+
Phlegra dunini +b) etosha :Azarkina G. N. 2003. Rev. Arachn., 14, (6): 85-87, f 110-113 +b) Logunov, Azarkina 2006. Rev. Suisse zool., 113(4): 730-731, f 8-15 + Haddad, Wesołowska 2011. © Afr. Invertebr. 52(1): 102-1104, f 136-137, 146-150.
+b) +c)
Phlegra gagnoa +b) touba +c) tristis : Logunov, Azarkina 2006. Rev. Suisse zool., 113(4): 731-732, f 16-19 + Wesołowska, Russel-Smith 2011: Ann. zool. 61(3): 590, f 136-139 +b) 591-592, f 140-142 + Logunov, Azarkina 2006. Rev. Suisse zool., 113(4): 741-743, f 58-71 +c) .744-745, f 72-74 (75 = P. ugubris) By courtesy.
b)
Phlegra kulczynskii +b) profuga : Azarkina 2003. Rev. Arachn. 14, (6): 90-95, f 40-41, 47, 54-56, 68-71, 87-91, 101 +b) Logunov 1996d. Genus, 7 (3): 553-556, f 49-56. By courtesy.
Phlegra logunovi : Azarkina 2003. Revue Arachn. 14, (6): 95-98, f 17-22. By courtesy.
+b)
Phlegra lugubris +b) langanoensis : Logunov, Azarkina 2006. Rev. suisse zool. 113(4): 744-745, f 20-29. + Heciak "Revision Phlegra", PhD thesis +b) Wesolowska & Cumming, 2011: J. Afrotrop. Zool. 7: 90, f 51-52. By courtesy.
+
Phlegra sogdiana: Proszynski 2003a. Ann. zool.. 53, 1: 135, f 536-542 +Azarkina 2003.Rev. Arachn. 14, (6): 101-103, f 23-28 + Andreeva 1976. Pauki Tadzikistana: 86-87, f 110-115. By courtesy.
b) +c)
Phlegra arborea +b) certa +c) atra : Wesołowska, Haddad 2009. Afr. Invert., 50(1): 70, f. 136-141 +b) 71-72, 142-146 +c) Wesołowska, Tomasiewicz 2008. J. Afrotr. Zool., 4: 39, f 150-151. By courtesy.
+b)
Phlegra imperiosa +b) varia: Peckhams 1903. 14 (1): 242, t 28, f 7-a. + Heciak "Revision ... Phlegra", PhD thesis +b) Wesołowska 2012: 20(2): 332-333.129, f 516-518 [comparison imperiosa (syntype - f 30, 32) with P. imperiosa-cf (f 31, 33)] +b) Wesolowska, Russel-Smith. 2000. Trop. Zool., 13 (1): 87-89, f 239-240. By courtesy.
++b)
Phlegra karoo + parvula : Wesolowska & Cumming, 2011: J. Afrotrop. Zool. .7: 88-90, f 46-50 + Haddad, Wesołowska 2011. Afr. Invertebr. 52(1): 104-107, f 138-139, 151-159129, f 516-518 +b) Wesolowska., Russel-Smith. 2000. Trop. Zool., 13 (1): 86-87, f 230-231. By courtesy.
b)c)
Phlegra procera +b) simplex +c) solitaria : Wesolowska, Cumming 2008. Ann. zool. 58: 205-207, 122-130 +b) Wesolowska, Russel-Smith 2000. Trop. Zool. 13 (1): 87, f 232-238 +c) Wesołowska, Tomasiewicz, 2008. J. Afrotr.l Zool. 4: 43-44, 164-166.
++b)
Phlegra pusilla +b) tenella : Wesołowska, Tomasiewicz, 2008. J. Afr. Zool., 4: 41-43, 158-163. +Wesolowska & Cumming, 2011: J. Afrotrop. Zool. .7: 90-91, f 59-60 +Logunov, Azarkina 2006. Revue Suisse zool., 113(4): 737-739, f 41-53 +b) Wesolowska 2006b. Afr. Ent., 14 (2): 250, f 109-112. . By courtesy.
b)
Phlegra bifurcata +b) caboverdensis : Wesolowska 1998. Bol. Mus. Mun. Funchal, 50 (291): 129-130, f 30-39 +b) Neon [sic!] caboverdensis Schmidt G.E. W., Krause R. H. 1998. Entomol. Z. n 108 (10): 425-426, f 11. . By courtesy.
b)
Phlegra chrysops +b) crumena : Heciak. PhD Thesis: Revision of types of Phlegra ["10757 P. chrysops E. S. Aden!" (MNHN-Paris)] +b) Prochniewicz M., Heciak S. 1994. Ann. zool., 45: 37, f 4a-e. By courtesy.
b) +c)
Phlegra levis +b) lineata +c) cf-lineata : Prochniewicz M., Heciak S. 1994. Ann. zool., 45: 37, f 5a-e. +b) Metzner 1999. Andrias: 14 70-71, 189, f 35a-l +c) Proszynski 2003a. Ann. zool.: 137-138, f 555-561 [studied & drawn by S. Heciak].
b)
Phlegra loripes +b) memorialis : (a+b)Heciak. PhD Thesis: Revision of types of Phlegra +129, f 516-518. By courtesy.
b)
Phlegra msilana n.sp. +b) theseusi : Heciak. PhD Thesis: Revision of types of Phlegra +b) Logunov 2001b. Arthr. Sel., 10 (1): 61-62, f 8-14. By courtesy.
+
Phlegra nitidiventris: Proszynski 2003a. Annales zoologici. 53, 1: 137-138, f 562-563 + .Heciak. PhD Thesis: Revision of types of Phlegra. By courtesy. Abdomen covered by black, light reflecting scutum, like Aelurillus politiventris. Note diagnostic dorsal protuberance at the end of flat part of thorax.
b)
Phlegra sp [arboret] +sp [Java] : 2 species from Borneo and Java, drawn by Proszyński and Heciak [sent for further study to Azarkina].
+b)c)d)e)
Phlegra albostriata +b) carinata +c) mirabilis +d) fulviventris +e) fulvotrilineata: Lessert. 1936. Rev. suisse zool., 43(9): 294, f 91 + Wesolowska, Haddad C.R., 2014 . Lesotho. Afr. Invert. 55 (2), 257-258, f 94–97 +b) Butt A., Beg M. A. 2000. Pakist. J. Zool. 32 (1): 78, f 4A-B +c) 76, f. 2A-C +d) Lucas 1846: 151, t 6, f 1 +e) 155, t 7, f 7. By courtesy.
Phlegra prasanna : Caleb et al., 2015. Tamil Nadu. Peckhamia 124(1): 11-12, f 47-56. ©Photo J. Caleb. By courtesy.
b)
Phlegra sp [Shazia 1] +b) sp [Shazia 2] : ©Photo Shazia Quasin 2011. [ Nanda Devi Reserve 2000-4000 m, Uttarakhand, India]. By courtesy.
++
Phlegra cinereofasciata : Azarkina 2003. 14, (6): 82-85, figs 64-67 + S. Heciak. Paralectotype + © Photo A. Tok. By courtesy.
+b)c)
Phlegra nuda +b) pisarskii +c) proszynskii : Prochniewicz M., Heciak S. 1994. Ann. zool., 45: 37, f 6a-f. + Wesolowska, Russel-Smith. 2000. Trop. Zool., 13 (1): 84-85, f 225-229 +b) Zabka 1985.Ann. zool., 39, 11: 431, f 455-457 +c) Żabka, 2012. ©Zootaxa 3176: 62-63, f 1-7. By courtesy.
b)
Phlegra obscurimagna +b) rogenhoferi : Azarkina 2003. Revue Arachn. 14, (6): 98-100, f 44-45, 61-63, 72-75, 92-96, 103 +b) Heciak "Revision ... Phlegra", PhD thesis. By courtesy.
+ +
Phlegra sierrana : Proszynski - type specimen of Pseudomogrus pennatus + Azarkina 2003. 14, (6): 73-108, figs 105-110 + Heciak "Revision ... Phlegra", PhD thesis. By courtesy.